Fragments of sandstone recovered from several graves in Svingerud, Norway have been reassembled into a single stone with runic inscriptions that have yielded the earliest known date for such an inscription. Various references read so far from the stone are Svingerud and Hole (a small village nearby).
It is
believed that the idea of runic writing, of recording their language by making
marks on a surface, was inspired by writing from somewhere around the
Mediterranean. The shapes of the runes were, however, independently invented,
not copied from Mediterranean examples.
“The development of runic writing (the early Germanic alphabetic script) and the practice of inscribing runes on stone are difficult to trace, particularly as rune-stone inscriptions are rarely found in original and/or datable contexts. The discovery of several inscribed sandstone fragments at the grave field at Svingerud, Norway, with associated radiocarbon dates of 50 BC–AD 275, now provide the earliest known context for a runestone. An unusual mixture of runes and other markings are revealed as the fragments are reconstructed into a single standing stone, suggesting multiple episodes of inscription and providing insight into early runic writing practices in Iron Age Scandinavia.” (Solheim et al. 2025:422) What is so fascinating is that it was broken up and the fragments distributed like this with at least one found in a grave.
I think
that the context of the discovery suggests that runic writing and the stone
upon which it had been inscribed, must have been considered especially
significant to the people of that time and place.
“In a flat grave beneath one of the grave mounds,a sandstone fragment with runes from the older futhark was uncovered. Five radiocarbon dates and artifacts included in the burial suggest that the grave dates to the Roman Iron Age, between 50 BC and AD 275. Additional sandstone fragments with runes were discovered in other contexts during the excavations. Detailed examination confirms that the fragments are all from the same original slab while the inscriptions may represent different acts of carving. In this first comprehensive archaeological and runological study of the Svingerud find, we piece together the finds made during different seasons of excavation and drawn from different dating contexts, and assess the multiple inscriptions found on the different fragments. Associated radiocarbon dates indicate that this is the earliest dated rune-stone found so far; runological analysis of the multiple thinly incised markings therefore provides important insights into early runic writing and inscriptional practices on stone.” (Solheim et al. 2025:423) With different carving episodes the purpose of this stone is a real conundrum. Not only that, but then the stone was broken up and distributed around – why?
A great number of the symbols have been identified, but the researchers do not yet have translations of the meanings of the inscriptions. “The runic fragments from the Svingerud grave field can be dated between 50 BC and AD 275 based on radiocarbon dates from grave A4367, which contained the inscribed fragment Hole 2. This is a rare example of finding several fragments of a rune-stone, with some of the fragments in well-preserved, datable archaeological contexts. The dating frame is relatively wide, but still makes the Hole fragments the earliest known archaeologically dated rune-stone. The early dates and the inscriptional features are new evidence on the use of runes on stone, prompting discussion on the meanings and functions of the fragments and early Scandinavian rune-stones. Particular rune-forms on the dated fragments—such as the multi-pocket ‘b’ and the multitude of zigzag-like marks—underpin the epigraphic importance of the find. The recorded forms may show some early variants of runes, used on stone.” (Solheim et al. 2025:437) The episodes of engraving were apparently far enough apart in time that the forms of some of the runes had changed, leading to the difficulties in translation.
So we have
the earliest known rune stone, with inscriptions dating from more than one
episode of engraving, which was then broken up and the pieces distributed
around the area of a burial site. This brings up so many questions, and provides
very few answers, but it is certainly intriguing.
NOTE: Some images in this column were retrieved from the internet with a search for public domain photographs. If any of these images are not intended to be public domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner will contact me with them. For further information on these reports you should read the original reports at the sites listed below.
REFERENCES:
Ancientist.com, 2025, Norway’s Oldest Dated Runestone? Svingerud Fragments Reveal a 2,000-Year-Old Writing Tradition, DOI:https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.225. Accessed online 22 September 2025.
Biornstad, Lasse, 2025, Researchers found more pieces of the world’s oldest runestone – may
change the history of runes, 6 February 2025, sciencenorway.no. Accessed
online 22 September 2025.
.webp)
Posts
