AN ASSUMED WESTERN MESSAGE PETROGLYPH READ WITH BLISS SYMBOLS:

       

The Cameo Colorado Panel. Photograph by John Greer.   

It should go without saying that any mark made on rock has significance to the study of rock art. What we dismiss as vandalism is also data. One longtime mystery in the study of rock art has been symbols that are commonly called Western Mystery Petroglyphs or Western Message Petroglyphs (WMPs). These are usually dismissed as ‘modern hoaxes,’ even vandalism.

These have been seriously studied for some time by Leigh Marymor who has made considerable progress in analyzing some of the inscriptions. 

“The term “Western Message Petroglyphs” (WMPs) refers to a number of petroglyph sites found scattered among eight western states that are recognized by their shared image content and layout. The imagery is drawn largely from a mash-up of late historic Native American sign-gesture language and picture-writing traditions inter-mixed with pan-cultural imagery from around the world. An increasing number of sites that fit this mold have been reported over the past 85 years or so, currently numbering [40] in all. There is no question that these sites date to post-European contact based on images in some panels that depict Euro-American cultural content (e.g., western-style house, rifle, whiskey keg, horse, etc.). The post-contact era is also apparent in the method used in rendering the engraved images evidenced by the smooth angular lines and chisel strikes produced by metal tools.”(Marymor 2023)

Drawing of the Cameo Blissymbolics panel by Daved Lee.

The fact that they were apparently created with metal tools has led much of the field of rock art research to discount them as not worth serious study. But they are also data and should be studied for possible significance.

Far and away the greatest progress on finding meaning in these enigmatic passages has been made by Leigh Marymor.

“Marymor is a past President of the American Rock Art Research Association and has served several terms as chair of their Conservation Committee. He has received numerous awards for his work in Conservation and Preservation activities, as well as lifetime achievement in rock art studies and documentation. Leigh Marymor is also the Compiler of Rock Art Studies: A Bibliographic Database. The RASBdb project is a searchable bibliographic database of the World's rock art literature and contains more than 55,450 citations as of January 2026. The RASBdb was hosted as a joint project between the Bancroft Library (University of California - Berkeley) and the Bay Area Rock Art Research Association (BARARA) from 2003 - 2016.  In fall of 2016, BARARA affiliated with the Museum of Northern Arizona to continue the free and open access to the  RASBdb Project." (https://mna.academia.edu/LeighMarymor. 2026)

Marymor has recently made a further step in this study by reading one assumed Western Mystery Petroglyph inscription in the little-known form of picture-writing known as Blissymbolics.

As perhaps the most knowledgeable researcher on WMPs Marymor describes them as following.

“While shared imagery and historic landscape settings bind WMP sites together as a coherent whole, stylistic and compositional variations exist. Classic examples feature narrative picture-texts arranged in one line, or in two or more parallel rows (Figure 1), but the database also includes examples of WMPs laid out in clusters, brief phrases, and minimalist panels limited to one or two images (Marymor 2023:2, 14).” (Marymor 2026:9)

By applying statistical analysis to these inscriptions, Marymor not only found them worthy of serious study, but he also made notable progress in deciphering some of them.

“Approximately 70% of the WMP’s 255-image vocabulary appears to derive from a mash-up of late historic Native American picture-writing traditions. Another 24% of the images borrow from diverse global systems (e.g. Maya, Egyptian, Chinese), and the remaining 6% are generic or unidentified (Marymor 2023:4). The repetition of individual images, image compounds, brief image phrases, and formal layout among WMP panels support the hypothesis of a shared authorship—a central author operating with a small group of others who were in-the-know, operating between approximately 1880 and 1930 (Marymor and Marymor 2016:76–78).” (Marymor 2025:9)

In 2026, Marymor turned his attention to a supposed WMP inscription that had been discovered near Cameo, Colorado. 

”A linear rock engraving at Cameo, Colorado, was initially documented on the MysteryGlyphs.com website by Provo, Utah, independent researchers Terry Carter and Shawn Davies (n.d.). Leigh Marymor first encountered a photograph of the Cameo rock engravings there in 2014 and agreed with Carter and Davies that the linear march of pan-cultural ideograms appeared to represent the WMP style. Also, the semi-remote site location conformed well with the pattern seen at other WMP sites. Western Message Petroglyphs are located along historic wagon and rail corridors, dating to the period of western expansion at nodes along those routes that share associations with historic town sites, mines, quarries, and often times, features of the Mormon cultural sphere. The Cameo panel is located on a semi-remote rock wall adjacent to an old horse trail at the head of Main Canyon. The WMP panel overlooks the Palisades coal mining district located in the far distance down canyon.” (Marymor 2025:9)

 Charles Bliss demonstrating Blissymbols to young disabled language student. Public domain image from letterformarchive.com.

In a search for more information Marymor (2026) “uploaded a drawing of the Cameo panel to Google Chrome’s image search engine in January 2025.” This resulted in the revelation that images from this inscription were a 100% match with a writing system known as Blissymbolics.

The Cameo Colorado panel deciphered in Blissymbolics by  Leigh Marymor.

“Blissymbolics—a pictographic writing system developed by Charles K. Bliss between 1942 and 1949. Charles K. Bliss, an Austrian chemical engineer, semiotician and Jewish holocaust survivor, fled with his wife to a refugee community in Shanghai during World War II, and eventually settled in Sydney, Australia. From 1942 to 1949, Bliss passionately pursued the development of a universal picture-writing system that would enable communication without reliance on alphabet-specific systems. He developed his system with hundreds of picture words and thousands of complex image compounds, complete with rules of syntax and spacing. Although the project dominated the rest of his life, his universal picture-writing system never achieved wide acclaim. Blissymbolics was adopted for use with disabled and language-challenged children, eventually enabling many who were completely language deprived to learn how to communicate using his system of Blissymbols . The persistence of his system is evidenced by the works of the Blissymbolics Communication International Foundation, its website, and teaching resources on Bliss Online (n.d.) that include an online dictionary and Blissymbol writing and translation toolkit.” (Marymor 2025:10) With this lead toward possible meaning Leigh was able to translate the inscription. His resulting translation read “I want to walk out of here and possess a woman, in order to feel excited, I’ll walk with no clothes on.” (Marymor 2025:11)

His assumption, based upon the remote area of the inscription, is that the risqué engraving is analogous to Basque sheepherder arborglyphs found throughout the mountainous West. A remarkable detective story with a very amusing conclusion. Congratulation to Leigh Marymor and the other people who were involved. For full details of the search and the solution read the original paper by Leigh Marymor listed in the References below.

NOTE 1: The Rock Art Studies Bibliographic Database search engine at the Museum of Northern Arizona is located at: https://musnaz.org/search_rock_art_studies_db/.

NOTE 2: Several other individuals are listed in Marymor’s article as having been involved in finding the solution – Terry Carter, Shawn Davies, John and Mavis Greer, George Decker, Amy Marymor, and Judy Hilbish.

NOTE 3: I wish to express my gratitude to Leigh Marymor for permission to use his material and images, and his generous assistance with final corrections and editing.

REFERENCES:

Marymor, Leigh, 2025, A Western Message Petroglyph Site Falls from the Nest: Reclassifying the Cameo, Colorado, Panel through Blissymbolics, La Pintura, Volume 51, No. 3, Fall 2025, pages 9-12.

Marymor, Leigh, 2023, Western Message Petroglyphs: A Faux Indian Picture-Writing Project in the American West. Arts 12: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12010007. Accessed online 12 February 26.

Wikipedia, Bliss Symbols, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blissymbols.

SECONDARY REFERENCES:

Marymor, Leigh, 2023, Western Message Petroglyphs: A Faux Indian Picture-Writing Project in the American West. In World Rock Art Topical Collection, edited by R.G. Bednarik. Arts 12(1):Issue 7. MDPI AG, Basel. Electronic document,https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/12/1/7, accessed November 6, 2025.

Marymor, Leigh, and Amy Marymor, 2016, Western Message Petroglyphs: Esoterica in the Wild West. In American Indian Rock Art, Volume 42, edited by Ken Hedges, pp. 67–79. American Rock Art Research Association, San Jose, California.

A PETROGLYPHIC RECORD OF PHARAONIC CONQUEST IN THE SINAI:

 There is a lot of activity in the rock art world in Egypt. Reports of new discoveries are seemingly coming out more frequently then ever. A recent report by Mustafa Nour El-Din, and Ludwig D. Morenz (2025) ascribed a petroglyphs panel in the Sinai Peninsula to a period of Egyptian military expansion as a record of conquest.

The conquest panel, lines marked in on photograph.  Photograph by M. Nour El-Din, drawing by E. Kiesel.

Writing for Archaeology Magazine online Dario Radley set the scene as follows. “Mustafa Nour El Din of the Aswan Inspectorate at the Egyptian Ministry of Antiquities documented the carving during a field survey. Egyptologist Ludwig Morenz of the University of Bonn led the study of the images and inscriptions. The panel shows a large figure with raised arms facing a kneeling man struck by an arrow. The wounded figure’s posture signals defeat and submission. Nearby, a boat appears carved in outline. Early Egyptian art often used boats as symbols of royal power and state presence.” (Radley 2026) A section of the panel above the boat has been battered out to remove part of the image. This likely represents another example of the instances in Egyptian history where one Pharaoh attempted to have a predecessor erased from their history.

The conquest panel close-up, lines marked in on photograph.  Photograph by M. Nour El-Din, drawing by E. Kiesel.

El Din and Morenz (2025) interpret the panel as following. “Looking at the inscription we might understand the figure of the striding man as a representation of the god Min himself, but lacking specific iconographic indications. However, we should also consider the early date from a time of developing iconograpic conventions in depicting gods in the Nile Valley as well as the cultural periphery. We cannot properly decide, whether the striding man with raised arms depicts an Egyptian ruler (but no name or title is given) or the god Min (the inscription supports that understanding, but the iconography is different from what we might expect for Min: no crown, no phallus). If the striding man would have been depicted with the red crown he can be identified as Egyptian king, but that iconographic identification remains doubtful. Considering the inscription, it does not seem impossible to understand the main figure in the scene as an image of the god Min. Furthermore, looking at the entire composition, we can assume the boat to have been associated with the Egyptian ruler, the triumphant man with god Min and the subdued and killed man with the local inhabitants.” (El Din and Morenz 2025:87) Identification of the figure with the god Min is postulated because of a nearby text carved into the cliff which reads “(God) Min, ruler of copper ore / the mining region.” (El Din and Morenz 2025:87) Whether or not the large figure is the Pharaoh or the god Min the Pharaonic presence is definitely indicated by the presence of the Egyptian style boat.

The conquest panel drawing by E. Kiesel.

This panel is likened to a propaganda poster from the government. “Researchers see the composition as a message placed in a visible location along a travel corridor. The standing victor likely represents Egyptian authority under divine protection. The kneeling figure represents local inhabitants. The imagery forms a narrative of domination linked to resource control. Such visual claims supported economic expansion and reinforced ideological control over distant zones.” (Radley 2026) In this case, the nearby copper mines.

So, is this panel a historical record, or an illustration of a myth or legend. “When looking at scenes of violence, the fundamental question of historical reality versus ideological patterns and visual staging arises, and this seems a big question deserving future research. However, the historical significance of this 5,000-year-old rock picture depicting a scene of Pharaonic dominance lies in its value as evidence of Egyptian colonization of south-western Sinai during the Proto- and Early Dynastic periods. Why did Egyptian extensions of territorial claims beyond the Nile valley happen and why so early? To answer these questions, more detailed archaeological research in this area is needed. However, thanks to the surveys conducted by Mustafa Nour El-Din, we already know some metallurgical installations for copper processing (in this area), as well as copper slag, awaiting publication. It is likely that Wadi Khamila was already an important mining area for raw materials, especially copper ore and perhaps also turquoise, during the 4th/3rd millennium BC.” (El Din and Morenz 2025:90) As the military strength of the Egyptian empire was based upon copper the explanation of this panel as marking a site of early Egyptian expansion and conquest for mineral wealth seems to make the most sense. The presence of copper ore and processing, as well as possibly turquoise, would make this an important acquisition.

NOTE: Some images in this column were retrieved from the internet with a search for public domain photographs. If any of these images are not intended to be public domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner will contact me with them. For further information on these reports you should read the original reports at the sites listed below.

REFERENCES:

El-Din, Mustafa Nour and Ludwig D. Morenz, 2025, Wadi Khamila, the god Min and the beginning of Pharonic Dominance in Sinai 5000 years ago, freunde-abrahams.de. Accessed 30 January 2026.

Radley, Dario, 2026, 5,000 year old rock art in Sinai shows early Egyptian conquest and control of copper mines, 30 January 2026, Archaeology magazine online, https://archaeologymag.com. Accessed online 30 January 2026.

 

A ROMAN STONE GAME BOARD:

 

Roman stone game board. Internet photograph, public domain.

I have published a number of columns in the past on RockArtBlog about game boards in rock art (see the cloud index at the bottom). This one is about an example attributed to the Romans from between seventeen and fifteen hundred years ago that was found in the Netherlands.

“A limestone object recovered from the Roman settlement of Coriovallum, now Heerlen in the Netherlands, has provided rare evidence for how people played board games during the Roman period. The object, preserved in Het Romeins Museum, carries a pattern of incised lines on a flattened surface. Archeologists long suspected a link to play, yet no known Roman or earlier European game matches the design.” (Radley 2026) This presented researchers with a fascinating mystery. Can they find out what game was played on an unfamiliar board from that long ago? “Researchers used AI to reconstruct the rules of a board game carved into a stone found in the Dutch city of Heerlen. The team concludes that this type of game was played several centuries earlier than previously assumed.” (Phys.org 2026)

“Coriovallum was a Roman town in the province of Germania Inferior founded under the reign of emperor Augustus (27 BC–AD 14) and inhabited until the fall of the Western Roman Empire in AD 476. The remains of Coriovallum lie beneath present day Heerlen.” (Crist 2026:112)

The game board with pieces in place. Photograph from Universiteit Leiden. 

Although the artifact’s provenance, the details of its discovery have been lost it is believed to have been excavated in Heerlen during the late 19^th or early 20^th centuries. “Contextual dating, based on the typical archeological strata of Heerlen, places the creation and used of this board between 1,700 and 1,500 years ago.” (Carvajal 2026)

The flattened stone board has a pattern of lines engraved into the upper surface. “The engraving consists of a rectangle defined by a perimeter groove within which four diagonal lines intersect to form a kind of X shape, accompanied by a single straight horizontal line at one end of the rectangle, and apparently simple but enigmatic configuration.” (Carvajal 2026) This is really not how I would describe the design of the lines on the surface, but interestingly, instead of a series of similar boxes, pits or outlines the design essentially consists of a large rectangle divided up into differing sized rectangular and triangular spaces. The design is symmetrical with both ends the same.

Roman game pieces from Coriovallum. Image from Het Romeins Museum.

These questions particularly interested an archeologist named Walter Crist. “Archeologist Walter Crist encountered the stone in 2020 in the collection of the Thermenmuseum – which has since been renamed the Roman Museum. The worked limestone slab, measuring 21 by 14.5 centimeters, was found in the ground in Heerlen in the late 19^th or early 20^th century. Heerlen was once the important Roman settlement of Coriovallum. Crist specializes in ancient games and was immediately intrigued.” (Phys.org 2026)

Crist assumed that playing a game on this board would leave microscopic wear marks that might point to directions of movement of pieces. “Crist examined the stone under a microscope. ‘Wear was visible on the lines of the stone, exactly at the places where you would slide your playing piece.’ He enlisted the help of researchers from Heerlen and Maastricht. Restaura restoration studio from Heerlen produced highly detailed 3D scans.” (Phys.org 2026) They found the traces they were looking for suggesting possible patterns on the stone surface.

The wear patterns that were detected apparently followed along the diagonal lines on the stone. “To test whether play could explain the wear, researchers combined archeological observation with artificial intelligence-driven simulations. The team used the Ludii system, a platform designed to model historical board games. Two automated players competed against each other on a digital version of the stone board. The simulations drew from many rule systems recorded for small Northern European games, including examples from Scandinavia and Italy. The results showed strong agreement between the observed wear and simulations based on blocking games. In this type of game players aim to restrict an opponent’s movement rather than capture pieces. The simulated play repeatedly concentrated movement along the same lines seen on the stone surface.” (Radley 2026) While the results of the artificial intelligence analysis seem to confirm gameplay, they could not actually replicate for sure the actual game, which Crist (2026:1) refers to as Ludus Coriovalli.

Possible placement of pieces for the game as determined by AI. Image from Crist et al.

“The use wear on the stone was plausibly created through gameplay, moving playing pieces of a size and material composition consistent with examples common at Roman sites, including Coriovallum. - The fact that the observed wear pattern is only apparent in parallel with the incised lines suggests that those lines were meaningful for the action that produced abraded wear along them.” (Crist 2026:121) Although the wear on the stone surface was not as serious as the wear on the Monopoly board I played as a kid, it could be detected with microscopy. And the wear patterns suggested the possible movements of the pieces.

NOTE: Some images in this column were retrieved from the internet with a search for public domain photographs. If any of these images are not intended to be public domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner will contact me with them. For further information on these reports you should read the original reports at the sites listed below.

REFERENCES:

Carvajal, Guiellermo, 2026, A Roman Board Game Found in Ancient Coriovallum Rewrites the History of Strategy Games, 10 February 2026, https://www.labrujulaverde.com/en/2026/02/a-roman-board-game-found-in-ancient-coriovallum-rewrites-the-history-of-strategy-games/. Accessed online 10 February 2026.

Crist, Walter et al., 2026, Ludus Coriovalli: using artificial intelligence-driven simulations to identify rules for an ancient board game, Antiquity, Vol. 100 (409), 111-126. Accessed online 11 February 2026.

Phys.org, 2026, Rules of unknown board game from the Roman period revealed, 10 February 2026, Leiden University. Accessed online 10 February 2026.

Radley, Dario, 2026,  AI simulations reveal a Roman era board game in the Netherlands, pushing Europe’s blocking games back centuries, 10 February 2026, https://archaeologymag.com/2026/02/roman-era-board-game-in-the-netherlands/. Accessed online 10 Feb. 2026.

 

 

MUSIC IN ROCK ART – HORNS:

 There are a number of ways that rock art and music can go together or interact. I have written a number of previous columns on this which can be references through the cloud index at the very bottom of the blog. Music might accompany rites or ceremonies being enacted at rock art sites. Alternatively, the making of music can be the subject of the rock art itself. This column is going to be about representations of the playing of a type of aerophone – the horn. According to Wikipedia “an aerophone is a musical instrument that produces sound by causing a body of air to vibrate.” This includes variations of flutes, whistles and horns.

Field drawing of horn players, Guruve, Zimbabwe. Image from Kumbani and Diaz-Andreu.

A recent report on the rock art of Zimbabwe (Kumbani and Diaz-Andreu 2024) looks at the subject of musicians in rock art. They have designated a panel at Guruve as three men playing what they identify as trumpets. They point to three types of aerophones: trumpets, flutes and bullroarers. “These were probably made of bamboo.” They report that more than ten sites have been recorded displaying trumpet players. The trumpets are distinguished from flutes “primarily based on size or length of the pipes. Trumpets are typically longer than flutes. Flutes generally do not extend beyond thye player’s abdomen. In contrast, images of potential trumpets in rock art show that these instruments often extend past the abdomen and reach close to the knees.” (Kumbani and Diaz-Andreu 2024:15-16) These rock art images are attributed to the San people.

Scandinavian Lurs. Internet image, public domain.

Ancient Scandinavian war bands had a distinctive type of trumpet known as a Lur. Wikipedia describes a Lur as “a long natural horn without finger holes that is play with a brass-type embouchure. Lurs can be straight or curved in various shapes. The purpose of the curve was to make long instruments easier to carry (e.g. for marching, like the modern sousaphone) and to avoid directing the noise at nearby people.” (Wikipedia) There are some examples of Scandinavian rock art that show Lurs being played.

Panel from Kivik burial cairn, and isolated figure of Lur player. Image from The Kivik King's Grave.

One great example can be found in the Kivik burial cairn. “Few burial monuments in Scandinavia have been as well studied as Bredarör on Kivik, a  Bronze Age cairn, located half a mile north of Simrishamn on the southeastern coast of Skåne. Dated to roughly 1600 BC, and perhaps earlier, the site measures 75 meters in diameter. It is the largest mound of its type in Sweden. Systematically plundered for building materials in centuries past, a central stone chamber was uncovered in 1748, containing a central stone-cist, measuring 3.8 meters long by 1 meter wide, formed of upright stone slabs, the size of a human grave.” (The Kivik King’s Grave) On one of the stone slabs a pair of Lur players can clearly be seen, perhaps indicating it had a role in a funeral ceremony. This monument has undergone considerable excavation and reconstruction/restoration since its discovery in 1748. Such efforts, from that long ago, did not measure up to modern standards of archeology so we cannot be sure that what we see today is accurate to its original condition. I am assuming, however, that the petroglyphs of the Lur players are fairly accurate although, as we can see, it has been treated to the Scandinavian practice of paint in petroglyphs.

Lur players from Tanum Petroglyph Site, Bohuslan, Sweden. Internet image, public domain.

A major rock art site, the Tanum Petroglyphs, also includes an illustration of Lur players. “The Rock Carvings in Tanum (Swedish: Hallristningsomradet Tanum) are a collection of petroglyphs near Tanumshede, Bohuslan, Sweden, which were declared a World Heritage Site by UNESCO in 1944 because of their concentration. In total, there are thousands of images called the Tanum Petroglyphs on about 600 panels within the World Heritage Area. These are concentrated in distinct areas along a 25 km stretch, and cover an area of about 51 hectares (126 acres or 0.5 km square). While the region was on the coastline when the drawings were made, it is now at an elevation of 25 m.” (Wikipedia)

Moqhith Wilderness, Utah. Photograph by Michael Lau.

Flute player, Mesa Prieta, New Mexico. Photograph by Katelyn Bird.

In the prehistoric New World trumpet-like aerophones were often conch shells pierced at one end and often with a mouthpiece of resin built up. Many of these have been found in the ruins of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, where they may have been used for signaling or for ceremonial purposes. That said, I know of no imagery that might illustrate these. If any reader has examples of Southwestern American rock art of conch players I will be grateful to see such examples. I am struck, however, by the resemblance of the Zimbabwe musicians above to flute-player representations from the Southwest.

NOTE: Some images in this column were retrieved from the internet with a search for public domain photographs. If any of these images are not intended to be public domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner will contact me with them. For further information on these reports you should read the original reports at the sites listed below.

 

REFERENCES:

The Kivik King’s Grave, https://www.germanicmythology.com/MISCELLANEOUS/KivikGrave.html. Accessed online 20 October 2025.

Kumbani, Joshua and Margarita Diaz-Andreu, 2024, The art of music. The representation of musical instruments in the rock art of Zimbabwe, October 2024, Azania Archaeological Research in Africa (online in ResearchGate). Accessed online 18 October 2025.

VISUAL ESCAPEMENTS IN ROCK ART:

Back in 1979 I described what I call Visual Escapements to describe the clues that artists use to give the illusion of depth in paintings. As we know much of human creative history was accomplished before the creation of perspective in Renaissance Europe, and a whole lot of other creativity ignores the rules of perspective. One example would be the observation that things that are farther away look smaller than things that are closer. That can be explained by the rules of perspective, but one did not have to understand perspective to be aware of this phenomenon.

My phrase, visual escapements, was chosen on the similarity of the visual indications of distance provided by artists in paintings to the escapement mechanism in a mechanical clock  that divides up the time into segments of equal duration.

Ginevra de’ Benci by Leonardo da Vinci, 1474-1478. Internet image, public domain.

In Leonardo da Vinci’s Ginevra de’Benci these steps are comprised of various elements including the landscape behind her. First, her figure establishes the picture plane. The next is the tree behind her head and the left side of the picture. These are followed by hills with trees in intermediate and far ground, culminating in distant mountains blued by atmospheric distance. Each of these steps is definable as a visual escapement.

The Assumption of the Virgin or The Frari Assumption by Tiziano Vecelli (also known by Titian), 1516-1518. Internet image, public domain.

One can do the same sort of analysis for Titian’s Assumption of the Virgin, with figures in the foreground backed up by landscape features into the distance.

 

Both differentiation in size, and in vertical placement according to distance would be examples of my idea of Visual Escapements which I posited in 1979.

"Holy Ghost Panel," Horseshoe Canyon, Utah. Photograph by Peter Faris.

In 2019, Dr. James Farmer presented a webinar for the Colorado Rock Art Association in which he stated that he believes that the Holy Ghost panel in Horseshoe Canyon shows purposeful perspective with the smaller figures receding into the distance. I do not believe that the artists of Barrier Canyon Style panels knew the rules of single point visual perspective, but they would have observed that that are farther away look smaller than things that are closer. But, I would not call their use of this technique perspective, I would call the various sizes of figures apparently receding into the distance as an example of my concept of Visual Escapements. Another example, also illustrated in the Holy Ghost panel is that smaller figures are higher up than the bottoms of the larger figures. If the different figures are purposely sized in relation to the other figures in the panel, then one might indeed infer perspective and the use of visual escapements in the composition.

Horseshoe Canyon, Utah. Photograph by Don I. Campbell, May 16, 1984. 

On the other hand, if the figures were independently created and just scattered over the surface without relation to each other than this analysis may not be accurate. Did the artists know what they were doing, and were they doing it on purpose? And can we even know this?

NOTE: Some images in this posting were retrieved from the internet with a search for public domain photographs. If any of these images are not intended to be public domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner will contact me with them. For further information on these reports you should read the original reports at the sites listed below.

REFERENCE:

 

Farmer, James, Dr., 2019, Southwestern Rock Art and the Mesoamerican Connection, 18 April 2019, Colorado Rock Art Association online webinar.

A NEW CANDIDATE FOR THE OLDEST ROCK ART - A 67,000+ YEAR OLD HANDPRINT:

Researcher Maxime Aubert  in a limestone cave called Liang Metanduno on Muna. Photograph Ahdi Agus Oktaviana, 21 January 2026.

Almost a year ago I published a column on RockArtBlog on what was claimed to be the oldest rock art discovered so far, a 66,000+ year old hand print in Maltrivieso Cave in Spain (Faris 2025). Now, a new candidate has emerged from a cave on the Indonesian island of Muna, a handprint dated at 67,800+ years of age.

The islands in the Indonesian archipelago were on the transit route for the early humans who ended up in Australia. Some of these people would have settled locally in their tropical paradise, and this was very early indeed in the chronicles of human migration. “In an Indonesian cave system known for its prehistoric art, the oldest cave art yet found was hiding in plain sight. In a cave full of paintings that were well studied over the years, a faint hand stencil on the ceiling had been overlooked. – A nearby stencil dated to about 60,900 years ago.” (Callaway 2026)

Overlooked because of its location and being faded. It will be very interesting to see what future results of these studies will produce. There may be much more to learn there.

The faint handprint between two other images. Image from Griffith University.

Having found this overlooked handprint, their next step was to date it. “The oldest minimum-age constraint we obtained is for a hand stencil (sample LMET2) from Liang Metanduno in Muna Island. This motif is partly covered by ancient coralloid speleothems. This stencil is in a poor state of preservation, comprising only a 14 × 10 cm patch of faded pigment bearing a portion of the fingers and the adjoining palm area. The tip of one finger appears to have been artificially narrowed, either through the additional application of pigment or by moving the hand during pigment application, a distinct type of hand stencil art thus far identified only in Sulawesi. Dating results show that this stencil was produced at least 67.8  thousand years ago (ka) (71.6 ± 3.8 ka).” (Oktavian et al. 2026) This dating was apparently made with uranium/thorium dating of rock deposited over the surface of the handprint. This means that the higher figure of 71.6 thousand years could, in fact, be close to the accurate date.

Close-up of the handprint. Image from Griffith University.

In ages of lowered sea levels the Indonesian archipelago could have been transited on foot, and at times of higher sea level early rafts or boats would suffice for population movement. “It’s not yet clear whose hands made the prints. They could be from an ancient human group called Denisomans who lived in the area and may have interacted with our Homo sapiens ancestors before eventually going extinct. Or they may belong to modern humans venturing away from Africa, who could have wandered through the Middle East and Australia around this time. Fine details on the cave art, including the intentionally modified fingertips, point to a human hand.” (Ramakrishnan 2026) While we are pretty sure that early humans were here because of their early arrival in Australia, we cannot know for certain that Homo sapiens made these prints. As Ramakrishnan states it is possible that Denisovans also could have been in that area although there is not yet any corroborating data for that. We must remember that “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” (although this quote is usually attributed to Carl Sagan its first uses can be traced back to the 1890s).

Additional examples of handprints with narrowed fingers. Image by Maxime Aubert.

This narrowing of the fingertip is very interesting. “Consistent with a style that has, so far, only been found on Sulawesi, the hand is depicted with pointy, clawlike fingers. Researchers believe the style might serve to emphasize the close connection between humans and animals, which is “something we already seem to see in the very early painted art of Sulawesi, with at least one instance of a scene portraying figures that we interpret as representations of part-human, part-animal beings,’ said study co-author Adam Brumm of Griffith University in a statement.” (Callaway 2026) I am assuming that this part-human, part-animal interpretation is seeing the narrowed fingertips as portrayals of hands with claws. This is something that I have to take with a grain of salt. While therianthropic figures mixing human and animal traits are common in rock art the world over a picture of a handprint with narrow fingers does not strike me as related.

 

REFERENCES:

Callaway, K.R., 2026, Oldest cave art ever found discovered in Indonesia, www.scientificamerican.com. Accessed online 21 January 2026.

Faris, Peter, 2025, A newer candidate for the oldest rock art – a 66,000+ year old hand print, 18 January 2025, RockArtBlog, https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/7760124847746733855/3761715241354171606

Oktavian ,Adhi Agus et al., 2026, Rock art from at least 67,800 years ago in Sulawesi, Nature online, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09968-y.

Ramakrishnan, Adithi, 2026, Indonesian handprints are the oldest cave art found yet, 21 January 2026, Associated Press. Accessed online 2 February 2026.

LEPIDOPTERA IN UPPER PALEOLITHIC CAVE ART AND ROCK ART:

Le Trois Freres Cave, France. Image from Nazari, p. 66.

A few months ago I received a very interesting paper from Canada by a researcher with the name of Vazrick Nazari. Nazari discussed the possibility of some Upper Paleolithic imagery representing Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths). Having written about other insects in RockArtBlog (bees, spiders, centipedes, earwigs – see cloud index below) I have found this a compelling subject and am now ready to tackle it.

Nazari set the scene in this way. “A succession of cultures in the Upper Paleolithic are recognized, mainly based on their stone tools. The earliest, the Aurignacian in Europe, lasted roughly from 45,000–28,000 BP (Wood 2011). The hunter-gatherer Aurignacian culture also included artists who created the magnificent decorations at Chauvet cave in the Ardéche Valley of France, one of the earliest known painted caves in Europe. Several Aurignacian sites with parietal art have been identified in France, Spain, Italy, and Eastern Europe. Subsequent Gravettian (30,000–22,000 BP), Solutrean (22,000–17,000 BP) and Magdalenian (17,000–12,000 BP) tool cultures followed the artistic traditions of Chauvet painters. Before the discovery of Chauvet in 1994, Lascaux (18,000 BP) was thought for a long time as the high point of artistic expression in the Paleolithic. Chauvet also upset the notion that representational effectiveness in art gradually improved over time from the early Paleolithic to the end of last Ice Age.” (Nazari 2021:66) The time span, and the range of cultures is immense by our historical standard of a few thousand years.

Nazari then described the tradition and nature of Paleolithic art. “For an art that lasted more than 20,000 years and over vast distances, it would be naive to expect a solid unity or a linear progression: No precise correlations exist between a culture’s technology and its art, and the age and style of Paleolithic art do not always coincide. Nevertheless, many characteristics are common through all Paleolithic cultures that produced cave art. Artists mostly represented animals and abstract geometric designs. Humans were seldom depicted and when they were, they appeared deliberately sketchy or caricatural, possibly because they did not play the same role as the animals in the myths and religious practices of the time.” (Nazari 2021:66) In this assumption, Nazari is assigning the motive of cave art images to their importance in spiritual beliefs of the culture that created the images. This would suggest that if they did not produce images of butterflies or moths, they must have not had any spiritual significance. It is hard to imagine that the beauty of some butterflies did not provoke some sort of spiritual connections though.

He then continued with some examples of insect portrayal in ancient art. “The oldest unambiguous depiction of a lepidopteran in rock art is Neolithic (~7,000 BP) (Schimitschek 1978) (Fig 3f). The conspicuous absence of Lepidoptera in Paleolithic art maybe explained by the difficulties associated with interpretation of the geometric symbols by which the Paleolithic people may have tried to represent butterflies or moths in their art. Among the many categories of geometric symbols in Paleolithic caves, some of the “aviforms” (motifs resembling birds) and “tectiforms” (motifs made up of straight lines, such as rectangular shapes) seem to resemble schematic insects with two or four wings, similar to moths Antenna in resting position. Züchner (2000) assigned several of these signs to “butterfly-or-bird-type” symbols.” (Nazari 2021: 67-69) Here, we find that Nazari is assuming that there are portrayals of Lepidoptera, we just have not recognized them.

Chauvet Cave, France. Image from Zuchner, 2000, fig. 4.

Nazari cited Zuchner (2000) who wrote about butterfly or birdlike signs in Chauvet “these signs of Grotte Chauvet have no exact parallel in other caves. But anyway they are unique. Most similar are the breastlike sign of Le Portel (Ariege), the reliefs in the Roc de Vezac Cave (Dordogne) and the ivory pendants of the Gravettian site of Dolni Vestonice (Moravia). At least one of Chauvet’s signs has much in common with the red drawings of La Pasiega in northern Spain. The ‘butterflies’ of Chauvet may be the realistic predecessors of the varied family of so-called ‘signes en accolade’ (bracket signs) or of ‘Le Placard type’. Excavations at Le Placard proved them to be Solutrean. But there are firm arguments to assume an earlier origin of the type. (Figure 4).” (Zuchner 2000). It seems hard here to tell if Zuchner is finding some relationship or connection between butterflies and women’s breasts, or just pointing out the similarity. In either case Zuchner is now beginning the process of noticing butterfly-like symbols.

Vezac, France. Image from Nazari, 2021, fig. 8, p. 71.

Nazari sees some of these as butterfly symbols as well. “The reniform symbols in Roc de Vezac may be interpreted as two butterflies in the midst of a mating dance. The tectiform sign in Bernifal may depict a mating pair of Amata moths. These moths and butterflies are still present in Dordogne today. The Paleolithic people would have observed these critters individually and in copula. These early humans, with the same cognitive capacity as us, would have known what the mating pair were doing. For them, this simple act would have represented fertility, generation of new life, and the magic of procreation.” (Nazari 2021:71) What sense does it make to portray a butterfly or moth underground in a cave? I have to wrestle with this question while I write on this subject. Of course, one reason is preservation. The caves are where the images are preserved the best. But then I ran across a paper about species of moths that live in caves in Korea (Kim et al. 2018) If some of them can live in caves, then it would make more sense to portray them there.

North American Plains culture butterfly symbol. Image from legendsofamerica.com.

North American First Nations peoples had symbols for butterflies and moths that were used in their art.

Possible moth image at Three Rivers Site, New Mexico. Photograph by Paul and Joy Foster.

And I have photographed one petroglyphs at the Three Rivers Petroglyph site in New Mexico that might represent a moth based upon the antenna.

Butterfly pictograph from Chhattisgarh, India. Image from Tandan et al., 2026.

Finally, I found a beautifully portrayed butterfly from India. “The first evidence of butterfly on rock painting is reported here from Central India  along with a total of 48 species of butterflies photographed in Putka Hills, Korba district of Chhattisgarh, India. General analysis, including consultation with experts and comparative studies with known butterfly taxa, indicates that the depicted butterfly corresponds to the family Papilionidae. The size and shape of the butterfly in the rock painting are extremely comparable to the Papilionidae butterflies that are still seen in the region today. We noticed that butterflies of family Papilionidae are abundant and most visible in the area. Their abundance and the remarkable beauty, combined with their ease of sight, most certainly drew the attention of ancient humans, motivating them to include these butterflies into their rock art as a form of artistic expression.” (Tandan et al. 2026)

So, are all of these actually meant to be butterflies and/or moths? Probably not, but some are apparently accurate purposeful renditions of lepidopterae.  And the whole subject adds a new area of interest in rock art altogether, and something new to look out for when in the field. See you out there.

NOTE: Some images in this column were retrieved from the internet with a search for public domain photographs. If any of these images are not intended to be public domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner will contact me with them. For further information on these reports you should read the original reports at the sites listed below.

PRIMARY REFERENCES:

Kim, Do Sung, Soeng Joon Park, Sang Hoon Han, Don Won Choi, Young Gun Choi, Hyun Jung Kim, Dong Gun Kim, Hoonbok Yi, 2018, Ecological characteristics of a cave-dwelling moth species, Thiphosa dubitata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), in Baram and Ssang caves in Gwanwon Province, Korea, https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12254. Accessed online 5 January 2026/

Nazari, Vazrick, 2021, Lepidoptera in Upper Paleolithic Art, pp. 66-72, Antenna 2021: 45 (2), pp. 66-72.

Tandan, Hit Narayan, Ashok Pradhan, Nidgi Singh, Dinesh Kumar, Avinash Yadav, Ravi Naidu and Swati Tandan, 2026, Lemru Elephant Reserve Found First Butterfly Depiction in Rock Painting: A Remarkable Discovery From Korba, Chhattisgarh, Indian Journal of Entomology 88:111-113. doi://10.55446/IJE.2025.2005. Accessed online 5 January 2026.

Züchner, C., 2000, Grotte Chauvet archaeologically dated. Accessed online at: Tracce Rock Art Bulletin, p. 12. http://www.rupestre.net/tracce/?p=2812.

SECONDARY REFERENCE:

Schimitschek, E., 1978, Ein Schmetterlingsidol im Val Camonica aus dem Neolithikum. Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz 51: 113–115.