In the Great Plains of the United States the following peoples ranging from 10,000 to 7,000 B.P. are designated as Plano, distinguished by long, lanceolate, projectile points; Agate Basin complex, named for the Agate Basin site; Cody Complex, named for the Horner site near Cody, Wyoming, and including the Olsen-Chubbuck Bison Kill site and the Jurgens site; Hell Gap complex named for the Hell Gap, Wyoming site and the Jones-Miller Bison Kill site; and the Foothills/Mountain complex. (Wikipedia)
Saturday, November 28, 2015
EXTINCT ANIMALS IN ROCK ART - BISON ANTIQUUS:
Bison in South Park, Colorado.
Photograph Peter Faris, 1990.
In the paper cited below the authors (Agenbroad and Hesse 2004) argue that the belief
that Paleo-hunters did not live on the Colorado Plateau because the megafauna
that they depended upon were absent is just a myth. They point to fossil
remains located throughout the area in question, as well as rock art that they
identify as representations of the megafauna in question, as proof that both the animals and the
hunters occupied the Colorado Plateau from 12,000 to 6,000 BP. (Agenbroad and
Hesse 2004:189-195)
and Hesse, 2004, p. 194.
If this is indeed the case, then the rock art that they show
as evidence toward their claims must be illustrations of the extinct megafauna
species (mammoth and bison) that existed during that period. We thus have
numerous examples of rock art portraying the extinct species Bison antiquus. The actual existence of
rock art illustrating mammoths is somewhat more problematical although opinions
in the field are not as closed against it as before.
"Twenty-seven
radiocarbon dates are available for bison localities. These dates range from
more than 40,000 to 355 B.P. (the former date is the approximate upper limit of
radiocarbon technology). Six dates are from the protohistoric period, three are
from the Archaic period, and 18 are from the late Pleistocene. This information
suggests that bison were more abundant on the Colorado Plateau during the late
Pleistocene than during most of the Holocene." (Agenbroad and Hesse
2004:195)
"Maps of
paleontological locales and artifacts show that megafauna and Paleoindians were
present on the Colorado Plateau. When combined with rock art and a radiocarbon
chronology, they provide convincing evidence to dispel the myth that human
hunters and their major prey species did not live on the plateau from 13,000 to
6,000 B.P. Because of the dearth of preceramic studies in this region, at least
9,000 years of plateau prehistory is not being adequately researched."
(Agenbroad and Hesse 2004:195)
Colorado Plateau. Agenbroad
and Hesse, 2004, p. 192.
"Bison remains,
Folsom and Plano artifacts, and bison rock art are also found on the plateau,
and some areas contain all of these. Although some Folsom and Plano artifacts
are found in areas of the plateau with no recorded paleontological Pleistocene
than in the Holocene. The number of bison remains from Folsom and Plano
(Paleoindian) sites nearly equals the number from late Archaic and
protohistoric sites.
Prehistoric rock art,
especially petroglyphs, also lends credence to the presence of Paleoindian
hunters on the plateau from 12,000 to 6,000 B.P. These people were the
"Pleistocene pioneers." It is unfortunate that their presence has
been denied, overlooked, and unresearched for so long." (Agenbroad and Hesse 2004:195)
Large bison petroglyph overlapping
a mammoth petroglyph, San Juan
river, near Bluff, Utah. Malotki
and Wallace, 2011, p.147
Drawing of the large bison petroglyph
overlapping the mammoth petroglyph,
San Juan river, near Bluff, Utah.
Malotki and Wallace, 2011, p.147.
The illustration (Fig. 16.8) as well as the map of locations of bison and mammoth rock art (Fig. 16.6) both include an example from the San Juan river near Bluff, Utah. Malotki and Wallace have identified this as the figure of a Columbian mammoth with the overlapping image of a large bison.(Malotki and Wallace 2011:147) This would pretty much have to represent Bison antiquus, or one of his cousins.
The Clovis culture is a prehistoric Paleoindian culture, named after distinct stone tools found at Clovis, New Mexico, in the 1920s and 1930s. The Clovis culture appeared around 13,200 - 12,900 years before present, at the end of the last glacial period. Clovis is characterized by the manufacture of Clovis points and distinctive bone and ivory tools. Clovis peoples are considered to be the ancestors of most of the indigenous cultures of the Americas. (Wikipedia)
In the Great Plains of the United States the following peoples ranging from 10,000 to 7,000 B.P. are designated as Plano, distinguished by long, lanceolate, projectile points; Agate Basin complex, named for the Agate Basin site; Cody Complex, named for the Horner site near Cody, Wyoming, and including the Olsen-Chubbuck Bison Kill site and the Jurgens site; Hell Gap complex named for the Hell Gap, Wyoming site and the Jones-Miller Bison Kill site; and the Foothills/Mountain complex. (Wikipedia)
In the Great Plains of the United States the following peoples ranging from 10,000 to 7,000 B.P. are designated as Plano, distinguished by long, lanceolate, projectile points; Agate Basin complex, named for the Agate Basin site; Cody Complex, named for the Horner site near Cody, Wyoming, and including the Olsen-Chubbuck Bison Kill site and the Jurgens site; Hell Gap complex named for the Hell Gap, Wyoming site and the Jones-Miller Bison Kill site; and the Foothills/Mountain complex. (Wikipedia)
The Folsom Complex dates to between 9000 B.C., and
8000 B.C., and is thought to have derived from the earlier Clovis culture. (Wikipedia)
Fremont (ca. AD 100 to 1300)
bison from 9-Mile Canyon,
Utah. Photograph by P. Heiple.
Until we can adequately
date the bison images in question we will not be 100% certain, but logic
suggests that some of the images portrayed do, in fact, represent the extinct
species Bison antiquus, and, assuming that Agenbroad and Hesse are correct in
their claims, then we also have examples of rock art from the Clovis, Plano,
and Folsom peoples. The only real problem would seemingly be to discriminate it from the later examples.
REFERENCES:
Agenbroad, Larry D., and India S. Hesse,
2004 Megafauna,
Paleoindians, Petroglyphs, and Pictographs of the Colorado Plateau, pages
189-195, in The Settlement of the
American Continent: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Human Biogeography,
edited by C. Michael Barton, Geoffrey A. Clark, David R. Yesner, and Georges A.
Pearson, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Malotki, Ekkehart, and Henry D. Wallace
2011 Columbian Mammoth Petroglyphs From The San Juan River Near Bluff, Utah, United States, pp. 143-152, in Rock Art Research 2011 - Volume 28, Number 2.
Wikipedia
Labels:
Agenbroad,
Bison antiquus,
Clovis,
Colorado Plateau,
extinct animals,
Folsom,
petroglyph,
Plano,
rock art
Saturday, November 21, 2015
A PAINTED DINOSAUR TRACK IN UTAH:
Pictograph showing
painted dinosaur
footprint at Flag Point east of Kanab,
Utah. Photograph By John Foster and Alden
Hamblin, Survey
Notes, January, 2001,
Utah Geological Survey.
A pictograph (painted rather than pecked)
on a rock art panel at the Flag Point track site near Kanab, Utah, appears to
represent a tridactyl dinosaur footprint (Eubrontes);
these are the most obvious prints at the site, though there are also Grallator tracks. The footprints are in
the Kayenta Formation of the Lower Jurassic in the Grand Staircase – Escalante
National Monument. The pictograph dates to the Formation Period of the
Ancestral Puebloan (Anasazi) culture, between AD 1000 and 1200 (Mayor and
Serjeant. 2001:151).
Dinosaur track at
Flag Point, East of Kanab
Utah. Photograph By John
Foster and
Alden Hamblin, Survey Notes,
January,
2001, Utah Geological Survey.
These pictographs are found at a
location known as Flag Point in the Grand Staircase – Escalante National
Monument in southern Utah. There are a number of dinosaur footprints in the
rock there and nearby in a rock shelter is a red-painted pictograph panel. It
clearly includes a tridactyl form that very closely imitates one of the
dinosaur footprints found nearby. A number of other images in the pictograph
panel represent bird-man figures with outspread arms. Most viewers assume that
the bird-man figures were suggested by the presumed resemblance of a dinosaur
footprint to the footprint of a very large bird. This may in fact be the case
but it must be remembered that there are also fundamental differences between
the track of a bird’s foot and that of a theropod dinosaur other than size.
Most tracks left by a bird’s foot, whether
new or fossilized, show the fourth or posterior toe that the bird uses to grasp
with extending backwards from the foot. The tridactyl track of a theropod
dinosaur does not show that fourth toe extending backwards. The painting of the
large track at Flag Point in Grand Staircase – Escalante National Monument
lacks that projecting fourth toe of a bird’s footprint which suggests that it
does in fact represent the nearby dinosaur footprints instead of a bird track. Also, the angle of spread on the toes is quite different for bird and dinosaur tracks. The angle of spread between the outer toes of a bird is about ninety degrees, and the same angle on a therapod dinosaur's track will be nearer forty-five degrees. Although the Flag Point pictograph does not exhibit the fourth toe on the back like many bird tracks, the angle of spread between the outer toes definitely indicates that it is a bird track. But perhaps we are over-thinking this.
A bird track above, a theropod
dinosaur track below.
Having
drawn that distinction, I then have to ask myself if the Native Americans who
painted the Flag Point panel knew of the difference between bird and dinosaur
tracks. Since I am assuming that they had no knowledge of dinosaurs as our
modern science has revealed them, the question must be rephrased to "did
they know the difference between bird tracks and the tracks of something
else?" These people certainly knew their tracks so they would have
recognized them as such, but tracks of what? These large tracks in solid stone
would undoubtedly have been attributed to mythological monsters, indeed these
tracks may well have prompted the origins of such beliefs.
NOTE: This is really only the beginning. We have yet to look at the question of lizard tracks.
NOTE: This is really only the beginning. We have yet to look at the question of lizard tracks.
REFERENCE:
Mayor, Adrienne and William A. S. Serjeant
2001 The Folklore of Footprints in Stone: From
Classical Antiquity to the Present, Ichnos,
Vol. 8, No. 2, 143-163.
Saturday, November 14, 2015
LA 12609 - A PAINTED CAVATE KIVA, MORTANDAD RUIN, LOS ALAMOS COUNTY, NM:
Cavates at the Mortandad ruin, Los Alamos,
NM. Photograph Peter Faris, Aug. 30, 2003.
In 2003 we visited the Mortandad Ruin with our friends Bill
and Jeanne Gibson. This is on the Pajarito Plateau at Los Alamos, New Mexico, and
features rock art as well as cavates and other features. One of the most
exciting features there is a painted cavate kiva, in pristine condition and
virtually as good as new.
"The Pajarito Plateau was formed
by a series of large volcanic ash flows erupting from the Jemez Mountains about one million years ago. The ash
consolidated into a soft rock resulting into what is referred to as Bandelier tuff, which through
erosion, gradually dissected into the thirteen canyons upon which LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory) and the Los Alamos townsite reside. The
south-facing sides of the canyons frequently erode and fracture into vertical
cliff faces. Between the twelfth through sixteenth centuries, people living on the Pajarito Plateau carved
chambers into the tuff face, these referred to by archaeologists as cavates. By definition, a cavate or rock cut feature exhibits evidence of human
modification (Figure 3). This evidence includes excavation marks, a shaped or modified entryway,
floor or wall plaster, internal features including grooves, niches, sooting, or external
features (e.g.,viga holes, hand/footholds, or staircases). Cavates, rock cut features, and other
associated architectural features are carved into the soft tuff and are subject to degradation,
resulting primarily from erosion. The Mortandad cavates, compared with others on the Pajarito
Plateau, are relatively stable, as the tuff in this area is less friable than other tuff
outcrops. Although the floors, walls, and roofs remain relatively
stable, some of the Mortandad Canyon cavates are eroded and plaster and sooting
that may have been present is now gone. The existing cavate deterioration
indicates that the outer layer of tuff can crumble and/or spall off when
touched or walked on." (Johnson and Hoagland 2010:2-3)
Cave kiva at the Mortandad ruin,
Los Alamos, NM. Photograph
Peter Faris, Aug. 30, 2003.
Of particular interest at Mortandad, is a decorated cave kiva. It is extremely well preserved and the walls inside are covered with images.
"The interior of the cave is
elaborately decorated with a series of bold, well-executed petroglyphs carved
into the soot-blackened ceiling and walls. A dado of tan plaster extends from
the floor to a height of approximately 30 in. above the floor. Figures
represented by the petroglyphs include the hunchbacked flute player, the plumed
serpent, masked dancing figures, birds and other animals. Apparently either
there were few fires in the kiva after the figures were carved, or they were
periodically cleaned, as the incised areas have little or no soot remaining in
them."
(Steen 1977:62)
"Arrow swallower" and club swinger at the
Mortandad ruin, Los Alamos, NM.
Photograph Peter Faris, Aug. 30, 2003.
"Mortandad Style.
The almost perfectly preserved room at LA 12609 is the type site for the
Mortandad Style of kiva art. To create figures in this style, the artist first
blackened the cave with a dense, black coat of sooty smoke (see Fig. 18). Then,
with a hard point of some sort, quite possibly a sharpened stick, he cut
through the soot to the light gray tuff beneath. The resultant figures are
large, rather stiff and roughly done. The Kokopellis and the club swinger - are the only figures in which any action is portrayed. This style was
found from Ancho canyon to Pueblo Canyon." (Steen 1977:22)
"In an unusual, perhaps unique, representation of magic, Kokopelli is shown swallowing and arrow. It is not known whether the club swinger is aiming at the hunchback, but these are rare portrayals of action. "'Sword" swallowing is a practice of a curing society at Zuni (Stevenson 1904).'" (Steen 1977, Fig. 19, p. 25)
I am uncomfortable with the identification of this particular figure as a "Sword-swallower" or arrow-swallower. If that is actually the case, the arrow is being inserted into the throat nock end first. This means that the fletching of the arrow is going against the grain. It may be, in fact, that this was a real practice observed by Stevenson (1904) and my problem with the concept is only personal squeamishness, but I would like to know that a thorough search of Ancestral Pueblo references and pueblo mythology has been conducted to eliminate a concept such as a mythological hero coughing up a sacred arrow. Another possibility is that the fletching of the arrow is purposely being inserted in the throat to induce vomiting. In the American southwest certain cleansing ceremonies included drinking a tea or infusion of certain herbs to induce vomiting that cleaned out the interior. Ethnographic mention of this sometimes also include the detail of using a chicken feather to tickle the throat if the onset of the purging was too slow. This might, in fact, be a portrayal of such a ceremony.
"Fig. 21. Masked figures and, at
the right, two quadrupeds kissing.
Kissing quadrupeds and birds
occur frequently in this style of kiva
art. (Meter stick shown.)"
(Steen 1977:27)
"Few geometric
figures were seen in any of the kivas; the style seems to run almost
exclusively to life forms. Anthropomorphic figures, either masked men or gods,
are common (see de Peso's letter below), but Kokopellis are seldom seen. The
most common single figure is probably the Awanyu. Birds and quadrupeds are the
other figures carved on the walls, and frequently they are shown in pairs in
kissing position (Figs. 20 and 21)." (Steen 1977: 22-3)
"Some of the
figures seem to have a Mexican accent, so a set of photographs (Figs. 19-22) of
the art work at the kiva at LA 12609 was sent to Charles di Peso of the Amerind
Foundation, Dragoon, Arizona. His reply was:
"Fig. 22. On the left is a possible
representation of a Mesoamerican
Sun god and, on the right a
Kokopelli." (Steen 1977:28)
"What a lot of
wonderful decoration - exciting as hell and twice as much fun! Starting at the
'sunburst' kid, who occupies the area between the two entries - isn't he
something! His sun body with the center cross is an iconographic form used by
the Mesoamericans to represent Tonatiuh (Beyer 1965, pp. 147 and 169). In his
left hand is a perfectly good 'horned serpent' and in his right, a T-shaped
club. By the 14th century, when the kiva was in use, it is believed that
Tonatiuh was submerged by the Huitzilopochtli complex (Nicholson in Wauchope's
Handbook of Middle American Indians, 10, pp. 424-426) in Mexico. If so, the
Anasazi snake-in-hand portrait would resemble that of Huitzilopochtli, as
depicted in the Codex Borbonicus 34 (Fig. 39).
Horned serpents and spotted animals
at the Mortandad ruin, Los Alamos, NM.
Photograph Peter Faris, Aug. 30, 2003.
The Kokopellis -
hunched, ithyphallic flute player, and sundry sword swallowers, etc. - the
'rainbow' Plumed Serpent, which was laid out as a design over the wall niche,
suggests some affinity with Quetzalcoatl. Below it are the two long-tailed,
spotted, kissing characters. They are a far cry from 'tigers', but they are
spotted and have long tails. Whether or not the one with the ears or 'horns' is
a male and the other a female is open to one's imagination. Further, there is a
relationship between this pair and the Plumed Serpent with the bifurcated tail
- it remains and interesting supposition. - - Not much I can say
about the kissing animals noted over the last niche and over the first niche
where the horned helmet stands." (Steen 1977:23-4)
Elsewhere I have speculated that the two spotted quadrupeds may be canines, given the straight tails, lack of claws, and also the lack of feline pointed ears. Canines or jaguars ("tigers"), I really do not know.
One must not get the
impression that ll the cave kivas from Ancho to Pueblo Canyon werre decorated
in this manner. From more than half the hundreds of cavate ceremonial rooms,
the inner surface has exfoliated so that all trace of any former designs has
disappeared. At other sites, the rooms were blackened but not decorated. Where
the Mortandad style figures were cut into the walls, normally only one or two
figures were made. We are fortunate that the best preserved kiva also contains
the most figures." (Steen 1977:24)
REFERENCES:
Johnson, Alexander F. and Stephen R. Hoagland
2010 Mortandad Cavate Complex Baseline Study,
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
Steen, Charlie R.
1977 Pajarito Plateau Archaeological Survey and
Excavations, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of
California, Los Alamos.
Saturday, November 7, 2015
A DEER TRAP IN NORTHERN NEW MEXICO:
Caption: "Fig. 23. LA 12612. The deer
trap at the rim of the mesa. Note the
easy access to the pit from Mortandad
Canyon at the right." (Steen 1977:29)
The subject of this posting is not technically rock art, but
it is a piece of stone work, impressive in its own way. This hole, carved into
the bedrock, is believed to have been used as a pitfall trap for deer. In his
1977 report on " Pajarito Plateau
Archaeological Survey and Excavations", Charlie Steen described it as
follows:
"Deer pits were
dug on low saddles between canyons. They were probably hidden with a covering
of light brush and given wing walls of juniper and pińon branches, so that a
deer could be driven from a canyon up a slope to the saddle and forced to the
pit where, hopefully, it would step on the cover, fall through, and break a leg
or its neck.
Sometime during the
late 1940s, I visited the game pit near Navawi ruin, and at that time there
were vestiges of heavy brush wing walls on either side of the pit.
The only game pit in
the survey area which can safely be called a deer trap is that at LA 12612. It
is located on a low saddle between two mesas, at the head of a rather gently
slope out of Mortandad Canyon. It could easily have made the apex of two brush
wing walls and have been used to trap game driven from the canyon."
(Steen 1977: 29-30)
Aug. 2003, Peter Faris.
This feature is relatively near the large prehistoric pueblo
in Mortandad Canyon at Los Alamos, New Mexico. Judging from what remains at the
Mortandad ruins is was a fairly large pueblo built against the cliff face. As
at Long House in Bandeliere, cavate rooms were then excavated into the soft
volcanic tuff to add additional space behind the constructed rooms. About all
that remains to be seen now is a number of cavates illustrating various
degrees of erosion. A few seem to be complete, while many provide evidence of
how far the cliff face has eroded in intervening centuries. We were led to this
site in 2003 by our friends Bill and Jeanne Gibson from nearby Los Alamos.
Although the excavation of the hole would have been fairly
easy for these Ancestral Pueblo people, it is after all not as large as the
cavate rooms they excavated into the canyon walls, it is still an impressive
feature. What I find interesting is that the easiest access, and the assumed
drive lines, come out of Mortandad Canyon which was, as mentioned above, well
occupied by people. How many wild deer would have felt comfortable enough
around that many people to be in place to be driven. Perhaps the situation then
was the same as the situation in many suburbs today, where suburban deer have
gotten comfortable enough around people to be seen virtually daily. But then,
would not the easy hunting have led to a heavy predation on the deer by hunters
eliminating any of the animals that were not fully wild? I will have to leave
this question to those who know deer behavior better than I do.
REFERENCE:
Steen, Charlie R.
1977 Pajarito Plateau Archaeological Survey and
Excavations, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of
California, Los Alamos.
Labels:
deer,
los Alamos,
Mortandad Canyon,
New Mexico,
rock art,
trap
Saturday, October 31, 2015
A COSMIC HOAX:
Station #16, Nine-Mile Canyon, UT.
Photograph Peter Faris, 1993.
Close-up of panel at Station
#16, Nine-Mile Canyon, UT.
Photograph Peter Faris, 1993.
In this column I am presenting another egregious mistake
from the book Odyssey of the Pueblo
Indians by William Eaton. On page 145 he presents a petroglyph panel that
he calls a "Pueblo (Fremont) Star Chart". That is his identification
of the well-known petroglyph panel from Station 16, in Nine-Mile Canyon, Utah.
One identification that I take exception to is what he calls
the two-headed mountain sheep. Upon careful examination of the petroglyph
Eaton's second head at the back of the animal is actually a conglomeration
composed of its tail and a couple of curved lines descending from an unknown
mark that has been destroyed by the impact of a large caliber bullet. The
remains of this mark can be seen circling around to the upper right of the bullet
crater.
On the left of this panel is a figure that Eaton calls an
"anthropomorph with a six-ball bola weapon." Now this is a very
interesting figure and does, in fact, remind one of a figure holding a bola. This
figure along with numbers of carefully rounded stone balls found at Fremont
sites have prompted this same identification by many other rock art
researchers. It is an interesting speculation, but one that has not been
proven. For some reason, and absolutely without any evidence at all Eaton has
claimed that "the three balls may possibly refer to the three stars now
called Orion's Belt." Which three balls Mr. Eaton? As you pointed out
there are six.
Then Eaton went on to identify the constellations Ursa
Major, Ursa Minor, and Serpens, as well as a few other stars including Polaris
in additional marks on the cliff face. Unfortunately, the majority of the stars
that Eaton identifies in this panel are, in reality, bullet holes put there by
Anglos much later than the petroglyphs. In many places, we find that
petroglyphs and pictographs provided seemingly irresistible targets to
gun-toting vandals. These unfortunate marks have never had anything to do with
Fremont or Pueblo Native American groups. Additionally, to make the constellation Serpens out of those bullet holes Eaton had to flip the constellation entirely as can be seen in the star chart below.
Star chart of the summer sky showing
Serpens to the left of center. From
Howard, The Telescope Handbook
and Star Atlas, 1967, p. 39.
This so-called "Pueblo (Fremont) Star Chart" is
just another mistaken example of someone who feels compelled to try to force
the facts to fit a theory that they bear no relation to in the real world.
While I applaud Mr. Eaton's enthusiasm, I do have to deplore his methods and
results.
REFERENCES:
Eaton, William M.
1999 Odyssey of the Pueblo Indians, Turner
Publishing Co., Paducah, KY.
Howard, Neale E.
1967 The Telescope Handbook and Star Atlas,
Thomas Y. Crowell Co., New York.
Labels:
9-Mile canyon,
constellation,
petroglyph,
rock art,
stars,
Utah
Monday, October 19, 2015
GLOBAL ROCK ART DATA BASE:

Global Rock Art Data Base home page.
An interesting
new development in rock art recording has come out of Australia with Robert Haubt's
Global Rock Art Database (GRADB). Unlike most rock art Internet sites which
focus on "see my pretty pictures," or using rock art to prove
Creationism, or any of the other many personal goals of the creators of the
websites, Haubt has built a framework for projects and data from all over the
world. I believe his aim is to, in effect, build the central library for
everyone's rock art studies. Even at its early stages the GRADB provides a
wealth of interesting information and provides links to many projects and
destinations. This project forms part of his "PhD thesis which is looking at digital
data management in rock-art heritage." (Haubt 2015)
The Rock Art
Data base currently has "over 200
sites, projects, and other resources currently listed on a world map. The Rock
Art Database brings together hundreds of rock-art projects from around the
world in one centralized hub. Find some of the most amazing rock-art places
from around the world through our interactive map and explore stunning media
galleries showcasing photographs, videos, 3D models and virtual tours."
(Haubt 2015)
"Mission:
The Rock Art Database is a non-for
profit online project at PERAHU, Griffith University in Australia. It seeks to
improve theory and practice in the digital curation of rock art data through
building a centralized global heritage community network. Through the use of
new technologies the database offers new ways to look at heritage data and
explores the potential in digital curation." (Haubt 2015)
This is a very
ambitious project which I believe will prove to be of great value. It will
eventually include "Interactive
Media Presentations: hundreds of photographs, maps, 3D models, Virtual
Tours." (Haubt 2015)
His stated goal
is to provide a resource will contribute to developing a rock art community
where people can "upload, manage,
share, and discuss, to assist conservation, preservation and
education in theory and practice by making rock-art related issues more
accessible and more visible. " (Haubt 2015)
Check this out
for yourself. Go to http://www.rockartdatabase.com/v2/, see the exciting
possibilities, and get on board with Robert Haubt and the Global Rock Art Data
Base.
REFERENCES:
Robert Haubt
(personal communication).
Saturday, October 17, 2015
PALEOLITHIC HORSE DOMESTICATION?
Paleolithic Horse paintings from Chauvet cave.
Photo from www.bradshawfoundation.com.
There is an interesting school of thought today that
maintains that cave paintings of horses, as well as horse effigies carved in
bone or antler, contain clues that point to domestication of the horse by Magdalenian people. One of the major proponents of this interpretation is Paul Bahn. I have elsewhere expressed my great admiration for Paul Bahn for his imaginative approach to interpreting cave art, and his willingness to confront and argue against dogma. I am afraid, however, that in this instance I find myself in the position of arguing against Bahn.
"15. Carving of a horse head from Saint-Michel d'Arudy, France, showing facial lines that indicate the line demarcating the mealy muzzle and the natural contours of the face. These lines have been interpreted by Bahn to represent a bridle. (Drawing courtesy of Randall White)" (Olsen 2003:5)
"The strongest evidence
presented for the control of horses at this early date consists of depictions
of what Bahn (Paul) interprets as bridles on the heads of horses in wall
engravings and effigies carved in stone or antler. These artistic renderings
display lines encircling the nose and running from the nose back toward the ear
(figure 15). At first glance these lines could be interpreted as part of a
bridle, including the nose band, chin strap, and cheekpieces. On closer
inspection, however, it is clear that these lines represent natural features on
the heads of the Pleistocene horses. The wild Asiatic (Przewalski) horse, which
is colored like many of the prehistoric depictions of the European Ice Age
horses, has what is known as a mealy muzzle, or pale cream-colored ring around
the end of the snout (figure 16). This is one of the characteristics of what is
today called a Pangare' coat pattern on horses. Although there are no clear
examples of a mealy muzzle in cave paintings, it is possible that some of the
engravings with lines around the nose are meant to portray this change in
coloration around the tip of the muzzle. The horizontal lines running from the
nose back toward the neck probably represent natural contours or the horse's
head. Curved lines are often incised to represent the contours of the large
masseter muscle at the back of the lower jaw, and some lines indicate changes
in fur patterns. Similar lines are seen on engravings of bison and other
animals, although their positions are slightly different, but no one has
suggested that bison were domesticated. (Olsen 2003:54)
Paleolithic baton de commandment. Public
domain photograph from the internet.
"Bahn also believed that the
Paleolithic batons de commandment were cheekpieces for a bridle. Although they
bear a vague similarity to much-later Bronze Age antler cheekpieces, the batons
are generally larger and heavier with only one very large perforation near one
end. Bronze Age cheekpieces typically have two or three holes for the leather
straps." (Olsen 2003:55)
"Further, Bahn presented
examples of damage on incisors (the anterior teeth) of Paleolithic horses that
he hypothesized was caused by the nervous habit of crib-biting. This practice
has been observed in horses that get bored with being penned and begin to chew
on their stalls. If this behavior occurs only in situations where the animal is
enclosed by a human-made structure, then surely horses were being controlled in
the Paleolithic. R. A. Rogers and L. A. Rogers have shown, however, that
similar damage appears on horse incisors dating to the early and middle
Pleistocene of North America, long before the arrival of humans, Littauer
pointed out that such wear could have just as easily been formed when the
animals browse on the bark of trees." (Olsen 2003:55)
"Some scholars, notably Paul
Bahn, have suggested that horses were at least managed an perhaps domesticated
20,000 years ago by Ice Age hunter-gatherers who created the cave paintings,
ornaments, and mobile art of the Upper Paleolithic (see chapter 3). This idea
has been widely popularized by Jean Auel in her best-selling fiction books
beginning with Clan of the Cave Bear.
Stocky, thick-legged, large-headed
horses living throughout Europe during the Pleistocene Ice Ages were depicted
magnificently in cave paintings and sculpted bone objects by Upper Palaeolithic
artists, particularly in southwest France and northern Spain. Some of these
depictions seem to show rope halters around horse heads (see chapter 3, figure
1). This interpretation is convincing at first. However, the shaggy winter coat
of the modern Przewalski horse often sports a line of tufted hair running down
the cheek and around the nose in exactly the positions marked by the
"halter" lines in Paleolithic art. The "winter coat"
interpretation of these lines is simpler and more likely than an interpretation
based on bridling.
Some Upper Paleolithic horse teeth
exhibit odd wear that Bahn has suggested resembles the wear caused by
crib-biting, a vice associated with stalled or penned horses. However, similar
wear has been found on the teeth of Early Pleistocene equid fossils from
America, animals that could not possibly have been domesticated because they
predate the evolution of both modern humans and horses (see chapter 3). There
has never been a controlled study that reliably identifies the diagnostic
traits of cribbing wear on equid teeth so that it can be positively
distinguished from natural wear or incidental damage to the incisors. The
crib-biting suggestion remains untested and inherently unlikely. It would
require not only domestication but long-term stalling of horses by Paleolithic
hunters.
On the whole there is little
archaeological evidence even for herd management and no convincing support for
domestication associated with the Ice Age horses of the European Upper
Paleolithic." (Anthony 2003:69)
Wood chewing, or
crib-biting, is behavior in which the horse gnaws on wood rails or boards as if
they were food. This behavior eventually gives a distinctive wear pattern on
the horse's teeth that a good veterinarian can identify in making his
diagnosis. Wear patterns resembling this have been found on some teeth on
Paleolithic (Ice Age) horse skeletons which has led some investigators to rash
statements that this is proof of horse domestication that early. In other words,
Cro-Magnon supposedly had built corrals and confined their domesticated horses
there, where they performed crib biting. I think that nothing could be further
from the truth.
Horses, both wild and domesticated, will chew wood on occasions. Where I
live in the American West, if a horse corral contains a cottonwood tree it is
almost invariable dead, the horses having girdled it by chewing the bark off.
Inner bark is a nutritious food that they purposely seek out, especially
when grazing conditions are poor. If drought has prevented normal grass growth
for grazing, or if deep snow has covered the grass, horses will naturally turn
to chewing the bark on trees. Indeed, ethnographic reports of Plains Indian tribes
tell us that they sometimes kept their favorite horse tethered by their tipi in
winter encampments which were usually in a heavily wooded area to provide some
protection from cold winds. The owners of these horsed would gather branches of
surrounding cottonwood trees to feed these horses which readily chewed off the
bark and ate small twigs and branches. This bark was supposedly nutritious enough that the horses reportedly could put on
weight on such a diet, even during harsh winter conditions. With reasonable explanations for the marks on the carvings and paintings that might resemble harnessing, and with a reasonable explanation for wood chewing by horses, I believe that the preponderance of evidence is against the proposed domestication of horses in the paleolithic period. Additionally, I can think of no way that evidence of crib-biting could be deduced from the paintings or carvings of the Paleolithic period. Therefore, with this analysis, I think that we can make an informed judgement on the question of domestication and, to me, all the evidence argues against it.
REFERENCES:
Anthony, David W.,
2003 Bridling Horse
Power, chapter 4, p. 58-82, in Horses
Through Time, edited by Sandra L. Olsen, Roberts Rinehart Publishers,
Boulder, for the Carnegie Museum of Natural History.
Olsen, Sandra L.,
2003 Horse Hunters
of the Ice Age, chapter 3, p. 35-56, in Horses
Through Time, edited by Sandra L. Olsen, Roberts Rinehart Publishers,
Boulder, for the Carnegie Museum of Natural History.
Labels:
cave painting,
Chauvet,
domestication,
Horse,
paleolithic art,
Paul Bahn,
rock art
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






























