Saturday, June 15, 2019
ANOTHER CLAIMED VOLCANIC ERUPTION IN ROCK ART:
Cakallar volcano from SE Turkey.
Livescience.com.
Credit Erdal Gumus.
The third
was my attempt to stick a pin in a bogus interpretation of the panel at
Petroglyph Point in Mesa Verde National Park as including an illustration of a
volcanic eruption. This was posted on May 7, 2016, titled Geology In Rock Art - A Volcanic Eruption At Petroglyph Point?, Mesa
Verde - Not By A Long Shot, answering a claim in the 1999 book Odyssey of the Pueblos, by William M.
Eaton.
Now a new report
is claiming that an eruption of a volcano named Cakallar was recorded in a cave
painting about a mile and a quarter from the volcano and has been dated to
4,700 years ago. Dating of the volcanic residue was accomplished with two
different techniques. "The first of
the dating techniques the researchers used measured uranium and thorium's decay
into helium to calculate the age of small zircon crystals retrieved from the
site. The second method, meanwhile, tracked radioactive chlorine levels that
indicate how long the volcanic rocks had been situated near the Earth's
surface. Together, this analysis places the Cakallar eruptions around 4,700
years ago." (Geggel 2019)
False color photo of one
of the footprints.
Livescience.com.
The area
came to the attention of the science world in 1968 when workers at the site of
a nearby dam noticed well-preserved tracks in the volcanic ash deposits. "Small prints at the site indicate that
these ancient people used walking staffs and were accompanied by an unknown
species of Canis, a genus that includes wolves, coyotes and dogs, the
researchers added." (Geggel 2019)
Enhanced photograph of the panel,
Livescience.com.
The
footprints and the rock painting are assumed to date from roughly the same time
and are credited to the same culture. "According
to both the study and Turkish archaeology news site Arkeolojik Haber,
the artwork in question is known as the Kanlitas rock painting. Found just 1.24
miles away from the footprints, the ocher drawing depicts a cone-shaped
structure topped by a crater-like elipsis. A thick line below the cone could
show lava flow and falling rocks, while scattered lines surrounding the
painting's focal point could represent volcanic vents." (Solly 2019)
Reconstruction of the painting.
Livescience.com.
Did you
notice what happened here? In the report, the researchers used the phrases "could show" and "could represent", while in
the headlines about it most of the articles are much more positive as in the
"Rock Art and Footprints Reveal How
Ancient Humans Responded to Volcanic Eruption" from smithsonianmag.com.
To my way of thinking we see way too much of this sort of thing in rock art
analysis and interpretation. This may mean, and that might mean, so together
they definitely prove that - - - - - -. Possibilities are not proof. Using
possibilities as evidence you can only achieve a possible conclusion.
While this
is all certainly possible, I must say that I am not convinced. I see what they are
saying but it is not very convincing. I just sort of think that the artist
4,700 years ago could have drawn a much more convincing mountain. I guess I
will just have to keep looking for volcanoes in rock art.
NOTE:
Some images in this posting were retrieved from the internet with a search for
public domain photographs. If any of these images are not intended to be public
domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner
will contact me with them. For further information on these reports you should
read the original reports at the sites listed below.
REFERENCES:
Faris,
Peter
2016 A Claimed Volcanic Eruption Pictured In Rock
Art, February 27, 2016, https://rockartblog.blogspot.com/search/label/volcano
2016 Ancient Map Preserved In A Mural Of Volcanic
Eruptions At Catalhoyuk, April 30, 2016,
https://rockartblog.blogspot.com/search/label/volcano
2016 Geology In Rock Art - A Volcanic Eruption At
Petroglyph Point, Mesa Verde? - Not By A Long Shot, https://rockartblog.blogspot.com/search/label/volcano%Petroglyph%20Point
Geggel,
Laura
2019 Ancient People Watched a Volcano Erupt. This
May Be Their Illustration of It, May 31, 2019, https://livescience.com/65609-ancient-volcano-rock-art.html
Solly, Meilan
2019 Rock Art and Footprints Reveal How Ancient Humans
Responded to Volcanic Eruption, June 4, 2019, Smithsonian.com,
https:/www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/rock-art-footprints-reveal-how-ancient-humans-responded-volcanic-eruption-180972337
Saturday, June 8, 2019
THE ROC-AUX-SORCIERS FRIEZE:
A section of the carved frieze,
Roc-aux-Sorciers, France.
Although we
often think of the cave paintings in Europe as a collection of individual
images, there are instances of larger overall compositions. At Angles sur
l'Anglin, in Vienne, France, is the remarkable art of Le Roc-aux-Sorciers. "The history of discoveries at
Roc-aux-Sorciers begins in 1927, when Lucien Rousseau discovered the
Paleolithic habitation and identified it as mid-Magdalenian in its culture. He
began excavations in the Cave Taillebourg and recovered an engraved stone in
which Henri Breuil detected the representation of a mammoth. Some years later,
Suzanne de Saint-Mathurin became aware of Rousseau's article and decided to
explore further, hoping to find some incised plaquettes like those from the
cave at Lussac-les-Chateaus, also in Vienne. Assisted by her friend Dorothy
Garrod, she carried out a decade of intensive campaigns between 1947 and 1957,
and followed more sporadically until 1964." (Wikipedia)
Discoveries
of relief carvings and paintings ensued and has now presented us with truly
spectacular decoration. Archaeologists and prehistorians now tend to interpret
the carvings in the two portions of Roc-aux-Sorciers as a single frieze,
combining the various panels as if they are one composition.
Many of these
figures are carved in deep relief with considerable overlapping.
"Starting from the left, the
first panel has a pair of bison looking in the same direction, the female
behind the male. The second panel consists of two horses going in opposite
directions, the left one with its head gracefully turned toward the other,
which is grazing. Above them is a bison, lying down.
The third panel has the most
extraordinary theme: a close group of three life-size women, side by side,
represented from the armpit level down to their ankles. They form a magnificent
trio, like the Three Graces."
(Desdemaines-Hugon 2010:141)
Horse, Roc-aux-Sorciers, France.
Internet, Public Domain.
"The Roc-aux-Sorciers Frieze:
During their early excavations Saint
Mathurin and Garrod found numerous fragments of stone decorated with rock
engravings or carvings of animals - several of them painted - that had fallen
from the ceiling and walls of the Taillebourg chamber. The discovery of these
petroglyphs was followed in 1950 by another find, this time in the second niche
known as Abri Bourdoin. Here, they uncovered the bas-relief of a horse still on
a wall at the rear of the chamber. Further examination led to the discovery of
a huge 18-metre (60 feet) frieze of relief sculptures, featuring bison, horses,
ibexes, felines, as well as several carved reliefs of female nudes, in the
style of venus figurines such as the Venus of Laussel (c. 23,000 BCE)." (www.visual-arts-cork.com)
"Combined with the fragments
found at Cave Taillebourg, the discovery of the frieze led archeologists and
prehistorians to see Cave Taillebourg and Abri Bourdoin as producing a single
work of prehistoric art, divided into two sections. In total, they believe the
frieze was about 30 metres in length: 18 metres (still almost intact) at Abri
Bourdoin; about 12 metres (now collapsed and in fragments) in Cave Baillebourg.
It contained a total of 34 figures, including: 7 horses, 8 ibexes, 6 bison, 1
reindeer, 4 felines, 1 unidentified animal, 4 anthropomorphic heads, and 5
stylized female figures." (www.visual-arts-cork.com)
Roc-aux-Sorciers,
Diagram of that panel, the
three female figures in red.
Internet.
The most
famous portion of the composition is a grouping of three female figures
familiarly known as the Three Graces. "The
first woman to have been produced was probably the one in the middle, since its
silhouette was designed in close correlation with the morphology of the rock.
The artist first conceived the figure mentally by integrating the nature of the
volumes of the wall before beginning the work. This is particularly visible in
the use of a natural cavity to represent the very marked opening of the pubis.
The legs are missing (they were found in Magdalenian levels during the
excavation by S. de Saint-Mathurin). Her belly is round, the navel open, and
one breast was lightly engraved and shown to the side. Her arms and hands and
her face were not depicted. The second woman is located just to the left of the
first. Being juxtposed, the two figures were probably made to be seen together.
Her belly, which was made round by the subtle use of volume and by adding a
curved line between the pubis and navel (possibly the pigmentation line that
marks the bellies of pregnant women), means that this woman is probably
pregnant. The hops are wide and the line of the buttocks and thighs also
resemble those of a pregnant woman. Her face is not shown, and nor are the
arms, hands or feet. Her body was thus depicted from the ankles to the upper
body, and hence it is not only the trunk of a woman, but an incomplete figure.
The third woman is slightly off to the right were the rock was visibly flat.
This shape of rock was most probably sought to represent a flat body without a
round belly. The nature of the wall gives the female body a flat volume that
contrasts with the body volume of the other two women. The proposed reading of
this figure is that it is a woman at a different stage of pregnancy, perhaps a
woman depicted after childbirth. Her belly is flat, and she is represented from
the front. She has no arms and no face." (Fuentes 2016:8-9)
These
remarkable sculptures actually remind me of the Greek carvings that they were named after, as well as the carvings from the
triangular pediments under the gable of the Parthenon on the Acropolis in
Athens, and nowadays known as the Elgin Marbles, a little in their style, and a
great deal in the feeling they impart. The Elgin Marbles were installed on the
Parthenon in 432 BCE (and carved over the few preceding years). Preceding the
Elgin Marbles by a few years is the Three Graces by Sokrates the Boetian
sculptor dated to ca. 470 BCE. Radiocarbon dating of sediments in
Roc-aux-Sorciers has "narrowed the
date to about 14,000 - 12,000 BCE." (www.visual-arts-cork.com) This
gives the Roc-aux-Sorciers carvings considerable primacy in ranking of
accomplishments in art.
Three Graces reproduction,
Imperial Roman, 1st - 4th cent.
Internet, Public domain.
I cannot
quite agree with the interpretation that the Roc-aux-Sorciers carvings
represent a single composition. With the number of overlapping images there is
considerable carving of new lines through old images implying that this was
done over a period of time. The amount of work suggested by its size and
complexity suggests a considerable period of time - but it is wonderful whatever
the truth behind it.
NOTE: An
excellent web site with a lot of information and great illustrations from
Roc-aux-Sorciers can be found at Don's Maps (see References below). Some images in this posting were retrieved from the
internet with a search for public domain photographs. If any of these images
are not intended to be public domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the
picture credits if the owner will contact me with them. For further information
on these reports you should read the original reports at the sites listed
below.
REFERENCES:
Desdemaines-Hugon,
Christine,
2010 Stepping-Stones: A Journey Through the Ice Age
Caves of the Dordogne, Yale University
Press, New Haven.
Fuentes,
Oscar
2016 The Social Dimension of Human Depiction in Magdalenian
Rock Art (16,500 BP - 12,000 cal BP): The Case of the Roc-aux-Sorciers Rock
Shelter, Quaternary International,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.206.06.023.
https://www.donsmaps.com/rocauxsorciers.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roc-aux-Sorciers
http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/prehistoric/roc-aux-sorciers.htm
Labels:
cave art,
France,
Roc-aux-Sorciers,
rock art,
Three Graces
Saturday, June 1, 2019
AN ALABAMA CAVE CONTAINING INSCRIPTIONS WRITTEN IN CHEROKEE:
Cherokee inscription,
Manitou Cave, Alabama.
Internet, Public Domain.
We
now know that writing was invented numerous times in human history, but very
seldom do we get to know exactly who invented a writing system and exactly what
their original creation was.
"Back in the 18th
century, when tribes such as the Cherokee were a subject of study by white
settlers, the natives in turn were amused by the "talking leaves"
they possessed. They could communicate and transmit messages, a skill that to
the people unfamiliar with the concept of an alphabet, or reading and writing,
seemed more like magic. There were many members of the Cherokee who were
against their society's assimilation with the white people and tried to prevent
it in many different ways, mostly by emphasizing the importance of their own
cultural elements."
(Radeska 2018)
Cherokee syllabary, Sequoya.
Wikipedia, Public Domain.
"Nobody did as
much as the man known as Sequoyah. Observing and analyzing the newcomers and
their "talking leaves," Sequoyah decided that creating a system that
would allow his people to communicate and transmit their own stories and
messages might help prevent the assimilation and the loss of Cherokee culture.
Hence, he invented the Cherokee syllabary with which to write the Cherokee
language. This was one of the two times in recorded history when a pre-literate
person created and original and efficient writing system." (Radeska 2018)
"It took Sequoya
12 years to finish the work he started in 1809. At first, he had been ridiculed
and insulted. Even his wife was said to have burned his initial work as she
believed it was some form of witchcraft. But the man didn't give up." (Radeska 2018)
"Although
he first experimented with logograms, his final product resulted in a system of
86 symbols, each representing a syllable. He studied the Greek, Latin, and
Cyrillic alphabets and even borrowed a few symbols from them, but the sounds
and representations of each in the Cherokee syllabary hs no similarity. When
Sequoya finished his project, he had to find a way to present it to his people,
who were very skeptical at first and couldn't see the importance of his
work." (Radeska 2018)
"Sequoyah's first
student of his new linguistic system was his six-year-old daughter, Ayokeh (in
some places mentioned as the daughter of his brother-in-law). He taught her the
system of reading, and then went to the Indian Reserves in the Arkansaw
Territory, where he found local leaders, the first people he needed to
convince. Sequoyah asked each one of them to tell him a word, which he wrote
down. Then he called Ayokeh to read what he had written. His tactic turned out
to be convincing, and he got permission to teach the syllabary to more
people."
(Radeska 2018)
Viewing Cherokee inscriptions,
Manitou Cave, Alabama.
www.ntd.com, Public Domain.
Now
a team has identified and deciphered inscriptions found in a cave in Alabama
written in the Cherokee script. "Inside
Manitou Cave in modern Alabama, nineteenth-century Cherokees carried out sacred
ceremonies, recording their activity on the walls using (the) Cherokee
syllabary, a system invented in nearby Willstown by Cherokee scholar Sequoyah.
Through collaboration between modern Cherokee scholars and Euro-American
archaeologists, the authors report and interpret - for the first time - the
inscriptions in Manitou Cave. These reveal evidence for secluded ceremonial
activities at a time of crisis for the Cherokee. Pressures from the surrounding
white populations disrupted the Cherokee ancient lifeways, culminating in their
forcible relocation in the 1830s along the Trail of Tears." (Carroll
et al 2019:519)
Although
there are extensive examples of partial words and symbols in the Cherokee
script on the walls throughout the cave "we
focus on two areas within the cave where Cherokee inscriptions are extensive
and where their meanings can be translated. The first area is more than 1.5km
into the cave's main passage, the second approximately 300m from the cave
entrance. Each area contains multiple inscriptions, and one inscriptions in the
deeper area includes a written date. Associated with these inscriptions are
signatures, one of which is a name that appears twice in the cave and which
significantly enhances the historic importance of the site. All of the
inscriptions in the two areas concern ceremonial and/or spiritual matters; they
were probably made in the seclusion of the cave and were not intended for
general audiences." (Carroll et al 2019:524)
"One inscription
on a wall deep inside the cave, translates as, "leaders of the stickball
team on the 30th day in their month April 1828." (Bower 2019)
"Other
inscriptions on a ceiling near the caves entrance may be religious messages to
Cherokee ancestors or other supernatural beings. The script is written
backward, likely because it was intended to be read by residents of what they
Cherokee considered to be a spirit world reachable only via Manitou Cave, the
researchers say."
(Bower 2019)
I
am certainly not a scholar of the Cherokee language or writing but I have a
problem matching some of the symbols in inscriptions retrieved from the
internet with characters in the Cherokee syllabary I found on Wikipedia.
Perhaps I am just failing to recognize the backward characters, or perhaps some
of the inscriptions contain ligatures. The paper by Carroll, Cressler, Belt,
Reed, and Simek does not mention any ligatures in the inscriptions but I find
myself wondering if any of the characters are indeed ligatures. "In hand writing, a ligature is made by
joining two or more characters in atypical fashion by merging their parts, or
by writing one above or inside the other." (Wikipedia) I will have to
leave that determination to the experts.
In
any case these discoveries provide a fascinating look at a painful period of
history, and underscore the importance of some historic inscriptions to our
understanding of past events.
NOTE:
Some images in this posting were retrieved from the internet with a search for
public domain photographs. If any of these images are not intended to be public
domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner
will contact me with them. For further information on these reports you should
read the original reports at the sites listed below.
REFERENCES:
Bower,
Bruce
2019 Newly translated Cherokee cave writings reveal
sacred messages, April 16, 2019, https://www.sciencenews.org/article/newly-translated-cherokee-cave-writings-reveal-sacred-messages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typographic_ligature
Radeska,
Tijana
2018 How Sequoyah, inspired by "talking
leaves," invented the Cherokee writing system, Feb. 24, 2018, https:/www.thevintagenews.com/2018/02/024/cherokee-writing-system/
Carroll,
Beau Duke, Alan Cressler, Tom Belt, Julie Reed, and Jan F. Simek
2019 Talking Stones: Cherokee Syllabary in Manitou
Cave, Alabama, Antiquity, Vol. 93, Issue
368, p. 519 - 536.
Saturday, May 25, 2019
BUBBA GLYPHS - A WHOLE NEW CATEGORY:
Christensen, Dickey, and Freers,
Rock Art of the Grand Canyon Region,
2013, Sunbelt Publications. p.222.
There is a
term that has been coined to describe the markings left on rock art sites by
the morons who vandalize the cliff faces and boulders throughout North America
- Bubba glyphs. This descriptive term uses the word Bubba in the most
pejorative meaning of the word - an ignorant, unthinking, uncultured slob who would deface
these examples of ancient art without a second thought.
I have, unfortunately, too many examples of Bubba glyphs in my photo collection as I am sure many of you do too. I am not sure why I prefer the term Bubba glyph to the term vandalism unless it is the colorful implications referring to the person doing the marking, as I said above, an ignorant, uncultured slob - a Bubba. Also, vandalism implies just doing damage to what is there, Bubba glyph implies the adding of new markings (glyphs) - by Bubba - it is tighter in meaning as well as more colorful.
First chamber of Sandia Cave
with painted graffiti,
New Mexico. Internet photo.
I have, unfortunately, too many examples of Bubba glyphs in my photo collection as I am sure many of you do too. I am not sure why I prefer the term Bubba glyph to the term vandalism unless it is the colorful implications referring to the person doing the marking, as I said above, an ignorant, uncultured slob - a Bubba. Also, vandalism implies just doing damage to what is there, Bubba glyph implies the adding of new markings (glyphs) - by Bubba - it is tighter in meaning as well as more colorful.
De Beque Canyon, Mesa
County, CO., Aug. 1981,
Peter Faris.
Our
definition of vandalism is changeable, it keeps moving. For instance, leaving
one's name carved into the rock used to be acceptable, think of all the
emigrant's signed rocks along the route of the Oregon Trail. They did not think
twice about doing it, and it was a perfectly commendable way of attempting to
correspond in the middle of the 19th
century, and indeed, now we value them as historical documents. But today we
would call that vandalism and there are legal ramifications. One person's
signature is another person's vandalism. But Bubba remains constant. An
ignorant, uncultured slob then would be an ignorant, uncultured slob now. A
definition you can count on.
I have
included a few examples here to illustrate the phenomenon. What examples have
you seen?
REFERENCES:
NOTE:
One image in this posting was retrieved from the internet with a search for
public domain photographs. If this image is not intended to be public
domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner
will contact me with them.
REFERENCES:
Christensen, Don D., Jerry Dickey, and Steven M. Freers,
2013 Rock Art of the Grand Canyon Region, Sunbelt Publications, San Diego.
Wednesday, May 22, 2019
WORLD CLASS ROCK ART IN KONKAN, INDIA:
Cow, Garge, Kulkarni, Apte, and Risbud,
2018, Photo used by permission.
Rhinoceros, Garge, Kulkarni, Apte,
and Risbud, figure 3, 2018.
Photo used by permission.
"The western coastline of India encompassing coastal districts of Maharashtra, Goa, and Kamataka collectively known as Konkan, extends 720 kilometres north-south. Lying between the Arabian Sea to the west and the mountain ranges of Western Ghats to the east in the state of Maharashtra, Konkan includes the regions of Thane, Greater Mumbai, Raigarh, and Ratnagiri. Geographically this region is traversed by seasonal rivers that drain the heavy monsoonal rainfall from the crest of the Sahyadri Hills." (Garge et al. 2018:39)
Deer, Garge, Kulkarni, Apte,
and Risbud, figure 4, 2018.
Photo used by permission.
Elephant and many other animals,
Garge, Kulkarni, Apte, and Risbud,
figure 4, 2018.
Photo used by permission.
Rock art in this region had been intermittently reported from about 1990, but the first large scale systematic surveys were conducted by hobbyists (locals) from 1980 onward. Sudhir Risbud, later joined by Dhananjay Marathe and Surendra Thakudesai, explored the region and in 2010 formed a group called Unexplored Konkan to discover and record this rock art. Efforts snowballed as other locals became interested, and in 2018 the State Archaeology Department got involved and set up a fund for the study. "As of January 2019 there have been 52 confirmed and explored sites, and over 1,000 petroglyphs discovered. A further 16 sites have been confirmed but (have) yet to be fully explored and recorded." (Standage 2019)
Elephant, Garge, Kulkarni, Apte,
and Risbud, figure 4, 2018.
Photo used by permission.
Animal figures - Herbivores such as elephants, rhinos, deer family animals, pig, rabbit, buffalo, wild boar, monkey, etc. and carnivores like tiger, etc.
Birds - Peacock and large unidentified bird species.
Aquatic animals - Shark, stingray, and many more unidentified species of fish.
Amphibious animals - such as tortoise, alligators, etc.
Anthropomorphs - Human figures including mother goddess like figures.
Abstract - Various geometrical patterns." (Garge et al. 2018:42)
You will notice that the larger than life elephant in the fourth illustration, as well as the smaller one by the end of his trunk, appear to have their ears raised above their heads. Raised, flapping ears in an elephant is supposedly a sign of anger and I wonder if this is an attempt to portray the emotion of the subject of the petroglyph, the elephant.
Garge, Kulkarni, Apte, and Risbud,
figure 10, 2018.
Photo used by permission.
Garge, Kulkarni, Apte, and Risbud,
figure 11, 2018.
Photo used by permission.
There are also complicated geometric patterns that reminded me immediately of Rangoli designs like those created for Diwali and other Hindu festivals.
Rangoli design, Wikipedia,
Public Domain.
"Rangoli is an art form, originating in the Indian subcontinent, in which patterns are created on the floor or the ground using materials such as colored rice, dry flour, colored sand or flower petals. Designs are passed from one generation to the next, keeping both the art form and the tradition alive." (Wikipedia) While the main purpose of Rangoli designs is decoration, they are also thought to bring good luck, and they are traditionally done by the women of the family. (Wikipedia)
It would appear that the petroglyphs reported so far are only the beginning, and that we can hope to see considerably more wonderful rock art from India in the future.
NOTE: I want to thank Rhutvij R. Apte and his co-authors for their work, and for providing their paper and photos, and cooperating with RockArtBlog on this report. Check it out at the address below. Also, the reference above to Rangoli designs is wholly mine, this is not from their report.
REFERENCE:
Faris, Peter
2019 Ancient Rock Art of India - The World's Earliest?, https://rockartblog.blogspot.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangoli
Standage, Kevin
2019 The Konkan Petroglyphs - Introduction, March 14, 2019, https://kevinstandagephotography.wordpress.com
Tejas M. Garge, B.V.Kulkarni, Rhutvij R. Apte, and Sudhir Risbud
2018 Petroglyphs in Konkan: Historiography, Recent Discoveries, and Future Endeavours, Purakala 2018, Volume 27-28, pages 39-47.
Thursday, May 9, 2019
ORIGINS OF THE OUTLINED CROSS VENUS SYMBOL:
Four-armed
outlined cross Venus
symbol.
Redrocks, AZ.
Photo Paul
and Joy Foster.
The 4-armed
symbol representing the planet Venus seems to have been ubiquitous
prehistorically among cultures in Mexico and much of Central America. This, to
such an extent that when we find it in contiguous areas like the American
Southwest we also tend to apply that meaning to it. But how did that symbol,
the outlined 4-armed cross or star, get to be associated with the planet Venus.
In order to approach that question I had to look into the background of the
subject.
In 1996,
John B. Carlson wrote a paper titled "Transformations
of the Mesoamerican Turtle Carapace War Shield, A Study in Ethnoastronomy",
that looked at war shields from Mesoamerica and the American Southwest. He
found that a common subject for the decoration of these symbols of conflict was
the crucifix representing the planet Venus.
"It is now well understood
that, at least from Late Formative times in Mesoamerica (around the beginning
of the Common Era and probably much earlier), the planet Venus was viewed as a
powerful male god of warfare and sacrifice. The evidence for this cult of
Venus-regulated warfare and sacrifice comes from various archaeological
sources, including inscriptions and iconography, from Spanish chronicles and
ethnohistorical sources, and from Pre-Columbian codices." (Carlson 1996:100) Additionally,
Carlson noted a frequent portrayal among Mayan (and Aztec) stela and other
carvings, of a turtle carapace used by a god or important person as a shield
(below).
One of the attributes
of the turtle in Native American belief, and I assume Mesoamerican as well, is
protection, because the turtle is protected by his shell. The step from that
observation to the use of a large tortoise carapace as a shield is an obvious
one. And, if Carlson, and others, are right about the connection between Venus
and warfare, then the connection of the turtle to Venus is implied as well. But
where did that symbol of the outlined 4-armed cross come from?
Carved
shell turtle pendant,
Mayan, Tikal,
700-900 C.E.
John B.
Carlson.
Carlson
opened his paper with an illustration of a "Late
Classic Maya carved shell pendant with the image of the eighth Maya day-sign
Lamat, the symbol for the Great Star or Venus, represented on the carapace of a
turtle. It was excavated in a Late Classic Period (ca. 700-900 C.E.; Imix
ceramic phase) burial PNT-009 in structure 5C-49 in the Mundo Perdido group of
Tikal by Juan Pedro Laporte." (Carlson 1996:1) This sign generally
consists of an outlined cross with a circle in each quadrant.
Mayan glyph
of the day sign
for Lamat,
the eighth day.
The symbol
for Venus.
This
certainly establishes that there is a relationship, but not why a turtle is
associated with Venus and warfare. He does go on "In Mesoamerican (and most Native American) iconography, turtles
appear in a diversity of ritual and ceremonial contexts." (Carlson
1996: 106)
Mayan
merchant warrior "Four Dog",
from Templo
Rojo, Cacaxtla.
Turtle
shell shield in lower right of picture.
Carlson
lists a number of these, among the the following statement: "Turtle shells, usually from large
marine turtles but also from those of smaller freshwater species, were used as
shields in Mesoamerica, as demonstrated in iconographic and archaeological
record and in the codices. . . . A beautiful example of such a sea turtle
carapace war shield is the one carried by a historical character, the armed
merchant warrior named "Four Dog," shown in a portrait as an
impersonator of the Maya Merchant God L in the Templo Rojo of Cacaxtla. It is
stowed on the lower back of the "cacaxtli" merchant's packframe
which, in turn, is propped up by his lance. This Epiclassic mural likely dates
from the 8th or perhaps 9th century C.E., placing it in the same general period
as the Tikal shell." (Carlson 1996:107) He goes on to give many more
examples of turtle/Venus/shield combinations but I think that this is satisfactory
for our purposes.
Ecuadorian
snapping turtle plastron.
Internet -
Public Domain.
At this
point I asked myself which turtle has such a symbol naturally on its upper shell (carapace), in
other words what turtle is the actual model for the Venus symbol. That proved a
little more difficult and a few hours of searching the internet failed to
provide me with an actual model. At this point I realized that there are, in
effect, two portions to a turtle's shell, the upper part known as the carapace,
and the lower or under part, the plastron. Searching images of turtle plastrons
fairly quickly provided the image I was looking for. The plastron of the snapping
turtle has the basic shape of the Venus symbol with the four legs representing
the circles in the four quadrants. Matching species of snapping turtles to the
territory of the Maya the two likely candidates are the Common Snapping Turtle
and the Ecuadorian Snapping Turtle, both of which have ranges that include some
or all of the Mayan territory. And, it strikes me, if you want to use a turtle
as a symbol of war, the turtle who can take off your finger or toe is certainly
a good model to go by.
Personified
star with eagle attributes,
Petroglyph
Park, Albuquerque, NM.
Photo Peter
Faris, 1988.
Carlson
continues in his paper showing examples of the outlined cross, with or without the dots
or circles in the four quadrants, as examples of Mesoamerican cultural
influence on the Native peoples of North America. Some of that might indeed be
true although I may not take it quite as far as he has. Where I part company
with him, however, is his attribution of this Venus image to the personified
star image of the Northern Rio Grande pueblo peoples. On August 11, 2012, I
posted a column titled HALLEY'S COMET AND THE ORIGIN OF THE STAR KACHINA in
which I suggested the possibility of Halley's Comet as the inspiration for that
personified star symbol. I see the star with a tail as more probably a comet (a planet with a tail) than as the planet Venus. Ancillary subjects would also include turtle images in
rock art. But,all in all the paper by John B. Carlson is an enjoyably impressive piece of
scholarship, and I highly recommend it.
NOTE:
Some images in this posting were retrieved from the internet with a search for
public domain photographs. If any of these images are not intended to be public
domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner
will contact me with them. For further information on this report you should
read the original report at the site listed below.
REFERENCE:
Carlson,
John B.
1996 Transformations of the Mesoamerican Turtle
Carapace War Shield, A Study in Ethnoastronomy, p. 99-122, Archaeoastronomy, Volumes XII-XIII, Songs From the Sky: Indigenous Astronomical and Cosmological Traditions
of the World, Von Del Chamberlain, John B. Carlson, M. Jane Young, editors,
Center for Archaeoastronomy, College Park, MD, USA.
Labels:
Aztec,
Mayan,
outlined cross,
petroglyph,
rock art,
shield,
turtle,
Venus
Saturday, May 4, 2019
ANCIENT ROCK ART OF INDIA - THE WORLD'S EARLIEST?
Cupule and groove, Bhimbetka, India.
Internet, Public Domain.
Very early
human occupation of the Indian sub-continent has been known for some time, and
the Harappan civilization of the Indus River drainage was one of the earliest
centers of city life in the world, almost rivaling the civilizations of the Fertile Crescent. While
we should have known to expect India to have a large amount of rock art they
have sort of been off the rock art radar for quite some time. This is now being
made up for with extensive scholarly studies of rock art on the sub-continent.
And these
studies are proving fruitful indeed. Excavations in the Auditorium cave at
Bhimbetka were conducted by V. S. Wakankar and others in the 1970s. They went
down to Acheulian strata confirmed by quartzite hand axes as well as geomorphology.
One of Wakankar's trenches also uncovered some petroglyphs.
"The Acheulian age of the two
petroglyphs in Wakankar's trench II, six meters to the south, can be
demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt. They were certainly completely covered by
sediment at the end of the Acheulian deposition phase, so they could not have
been visible since then."
(Bednarik 1996:70)
In other
words, these markings in the bedrock of Auditorium Cave were covered by
deposits laid down during the Acheulian age so they certainly have to be at
least that old.
What is
being claimed as "the oldest known
prehistoric art is the series of petrolglyphs discovered during the 1990s in
two ancient quartzite caves in India; the Auditorium Cave at Bhimbetka and a
rock shelter at Daraki-Chattan. This cave art consists of numerous cupules -
non-utilitaria hemispherical cup-shaped depressions - hammered out of the rock
surface. Geological investigations of the prehistoric sites by renowned
archeologists Bednarik, Kumar and others, have established that this rock art
pre-dates the Acheulean culture of the Lower Paleolithic era, and must
therefore date from at least 290,000 BCE.
However, once more advanced dating
methods become available, it is conceivable that these petroglyphs will turn out
to be much older - perhaps originating as early as 700,000 BCE - although at
present time this is mere speculation. Even so, the Bhimbetka cupules are four
times older than the Blombos Cave art, which is the next oldest Stone Age
Art."
(anonymous, www.visual-arts-cork.com)
There is a
tendency currently to consider cupules to be among the earliest form of rock
art, perhaps because of a cupule's simplicity. I am not fully convinced of the
arguments, but in this instance the dating evidence seems solid, and, if the
date estimates on these cupules are correct they are certainly candidates for
the world's oldest rock art.
NOTE:
The image in this posting was retrieved from the internet with a search for
public domain photographs. If this image was not intended to be public
domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner
will contact me with them. For further information on these reports you should
read the original reports at the sites listed below.
REFERENCES:
Bednarik,
Robert G.
1996 The Cupules on Chief's Rock, Auditorium
Cave, Bhimbetka, The Artefact, Volume
19, pages 63-72.
Anonymous,
Bhimbetka
Petroglyphs (290,000-700,000 BCE), Cupules at Auditorium Cave &
Daraki-Chattan Rock Shelter, http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/prehistoric,
bhimbetka-petroglyphs.htm
Labels:
Acheulian,
Bhimbetka,
India,
petroglyph,
rock art
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





























