PALEOLITHIC CAVE PAINTING - A PRECURSOR TO WRITING?
La Pasiega inscription, Spain.
http://channel.national
geographic.com/origins
The perennial question of the origin(s) of writing has been
long debated and argued over. Perhaps the earliest nominee for the title of
earliest writing is a row of symbols found in La Pasiega Cave, in Spain. This was discussed by Genevieve von Petzinger
in her 2016 book The First Signs,
Unlocking the Mysteries of the World's Oldest Symbols, from Atria Books,
New York.
Close-up, La Pasiega inscription, Spain.
http://channel.national
geographic.com/origins
"The 'La Pasiega
inscription' is probably the most unusual sequence of signs found anywhere in
Palaeolithic art. La Pasiega is part of the same mountain complex where we find
El Castillo and several other important Ice Age sites, but even in this
company, features like its grinding stone and purple bison make it unusual. And
these pale in comparison to the strange row of signs situated high on a wall of
their own, deep inside the complex, multileveled warren of passageways that
make up La Pasiega. With the dark-red paint of the characters still standing
out starkly from the pale, sloping wall, these abstract images are over twelve
feet above floor level - the artist would have had to scramble up a steep,
slippery incline to even create this series of signs.
What first struck me
when I saw these images was how organized and purposeful they looked: they seem
to be organized into three closely spaced units. The most complex is on the
left and consists of a pair of horizontal lines with other markings extending
upward vertically from this base. There is a symmetry to the arrangement: in the
center is a single line, flanked on either side by two stacked circles, with a
pair of lines on each end. The center unit consists of two images that have
been described as 'stylized feet' and are made up of oval shapes each topped
with five short lines extending upward (kind of like the toes on a foot). And,
finally, on the right is a single sign most easily described as a reversed
capital E, but with two lines in the center instead of one. Henri Breuil
described these markings as 'cabalistic figures' after visiting La Pasiega in
1913, and was one of the first pre-historians to refer to it as an inscription.
Whether these signs should be considered as part of a writing system is
something that continues to generate discussion and is really part of the
larger question that I'm about to try to answer for you, namely: "Is it
writing?" (Von Petzinger 2016: 182-3)
La Pasiega inscription, Spain.
Wikipedia.
" So in answer to
the question 'Is it writing?' I'm afraid the answer is no. However, I do feel
confident that Ice Age rock art was meaningful to those who created it and did
have communicative properties; it's just that no clear recording of language is
evident yet. Does this make the sequence of signs at La Pasiega an accidental
occurrence? I certainly don't think so. In fact, I lean in the opposite direction.
My guess is that those particular abstract markings represent an early attempt
to string multiple signs together in order to create a more complex message.
And while it does show that at least some Paleolithic people already understood
the potential of combining signs, when it comes to the 'writing question,' the
problem is that this row of geometric images was a highly unusual occurrence,
not part of a flourishing system.
The question now, of
course, is: If the signs were meaningful and meant to transmit information,
then exactly what were they trying to say?" (Von Petzinger 2016: 189-90)
For me, the most significant part of Von Petzinger's
analysis is her phrase "those
particular abstract markings represent an early attempt to string multiple signs
together in order to create a more complex message." (p. 189-90). It
seems to me that any serious observer would have to conclude that this string
of signs were purposely carefully planned and executed for exactly that purpose,
to create a more complex message. I do not know if the two foot/paw prints(?) and
the backward-E shape are intended to be included with the grouping on the left.
Von Petzinger apparently does lump them all together based upon their proximity
and identical pigment shade and color. Here, in North America, the two
footprints would probably be considered to be bear paw prints, the symbol on
the right I wouldn't know about. What really interests me is the grouping on
the left.
First, notice that the symbols in that group on the left are lined up on top of a
large rectangle as if on a stage or pedestal for a special presentation, but better than that, if they
were a word precursor (that is, a group of symbols that represent an object,
idea, or concept) they would be a palindrome - the same when read from either
side (such as madam, or race car) - and that, I am quite sure, is no accident. From which ever side you start you have a double vertical line, truncated figure 8, a single vertical line in the middle, another truncated figure 8, and another double vertical line. Whatever these symbols
represent, it is certain that their creation was the result of a deliberate and
complicated cognitive process. They represent something, I just do not know
what it is.
Genevieve Von Petzinger has presented her ideas in a Ted Talk, available through the following link (copy the following address and paste it into your browser):
NOTE: Illustrations in this column were retrieved by
a Google 10 search of the Internet for La Pasiega Inscription Public Domain. If
any results were used that are not meant to be public domain I apologize and
will be happy to give credit if you let me know.
REFERENCES:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/origins-the-journey-of-humankind/videos/inventing-graphics-on-cave-walls/
Von Petzinger, Genevieve,
2016 The First Signs, Unlocking the Mysteries of
the World's Oldest Symbols, Atria Books, New York, London
Wikipedia
No comments:
Post a Comment