Dilyehe, the Planter, is thought of as feminine and as the mate to Atseetsozi, First Slim One (Orion’s belt and sword), because they accompany each other across the sky (Chamberlain 2004:211-213). I suspect that Von Del Chamberlain is correct in this interpretation. He is a serious scientific researcher, not given to wild statements based upon his imaginings instead of upon data.
Saturday, May 23, 2015
NATIVE AMERICAN ASTRONOMY: THE PLEIADES - OR NOT!
While I will be the first to argue the validity of some
aspects of the field known as archeoastronomy, I am also a critic of the empty
assumptions made by some people who claim to be archeoastronomy researchers.
The most egregious examples are in the multiple alignments some people find
between rock art or archaeological features and the heavens. I actually once
heard a presentation by a so-called serious researcher who was looking for
alignments in a group of pits he found on a horizontal rock surface. He
explained that in order to properly analyze this he had to purchase a new
computer and software package, and in the end he came up with literally
hundreds of alignments to different stars, constellations, planets, and
phenomena throughout the year. The worst of all was that he did not see the
irony in this proposal, even when he was asked what computer and software the
ancient Native Americans had used to originally plot all of these alignments.
Dilyehe, the Planter, is thought of as feminine and as the mate to Atseetsozi, First Slim One (Orion’s belt and sword), because they accompany each other across the sky (Chamberlain 2004:211-213). I suspect that Von Del Chamberlain is correct in this interpretation. He is a serious scientific researcher, not given to wild statements based upon his imaginings instead of upon data.
One stellar sight that is apparently easy to misinterpret is the Pleiades. We know that they do have a place in the mythology of most of the ancient peoples of North America, and in some cultures they have ritual meaning as well. For some peoples their appearance marks the time to perform certain rites and ceremonies. To the Navajo the Pleiades or Seven Sisters are known as the Planter (Miller 1997:187). During nine months of visibility the Planter is seen after sunset in the Fall on the Eastern horizon, by mid-winter it is overhead after sunset, and in the Spring it slowly disappears over the Western horizon. The time of planting is reportedly indicated by Planter in the late Spring, early Summer (Cajete 2000:224).
In this photo from Blanco Canyon (Chamberlain:207)
Dilyehe is the pattern in the center. Chamberlain has
identified a number of other Navajo panels which contain
dot patterns that he believes represent Dilyehe.
The same photo from Chamberlain
(2004:207) with an arrow marking
the Pleiades.
Dilyehe, the Planter, is thought of as feminine and as the mate to Atseetsozi, First Slim One (Orion’s belt and sword), because they accompany each other across the sky (Chamberlain 2004:211-213). I suspect that Von Del Chamberlain is correct in this interpretation. He is a serious scientific researcher, not given to wild statements based upon his imaginings instead of upon data.
Diagram of Sego Canyon panel
from Eaton (1999:128).
An example of the opposite can be seen in the illustrations
from William M. Eaton. First off, he announced that examples of Native American
portrayals of the Pleiades only show four dots. I cannot imagine where he got this as most legends refer to them as the "seven sisters". As an example of this he
produced the Fremont panel from Sego Canyon, Utah where he found proof of this
claiming an astonishing eight portrayals of the Pleiades in this one panel (a
through h), although he actually seems to have missed the four dot pattern on
the top of the symbol he has designated as "v". The problem is, as anyone who has
actually visited Sego Canyon knows, that the dots on this panel are from
gunshots, and have absolutely nothing to do with any Native Americans,
prehistoric or otherwise. They were produced by cowboy vandalism.
Now I am not saying that Mr. Eaton is wrong in everything he
claimed in his 1999 book, The Odyssey of
the Pueblo Indians (although I had serious trouble with most of it). I even
want him to be right on some of it because it would be so interesting. The
trouble is like with all people who speak up without knowing what they are
actually talking about. He just doesn't have a clue about rock art.
Don't quit looking, and don't quit trying to figure it out, just
please use your common sense before you go way out on that limb like Eaton.
Someone might shoot it off.
REFERENCES:
Cajete, Gregory
2000 Native Science, Natural Laws of
Interdependence, Clear Light Publishers, Santa Fe.
Chamberlain, Von Del
2004 Father Sky on Mother Earth: Navaho Celestial
Symbolism in Rock Art, pages 195-226, in New
Dimensions in Rock Art Studies, edited by Ray T. Matheny, Museum of Peoples
and Cultures Occasional Papers No. 9, Brigham Young University, Provo.
Eaton, William M.
1999 Odyssey of the Pueblo Indians, Turner
Publishing Co., Paducah, KY.
Miller, Dorcas S.
1997 Stars
of the First People, Pruett Publishing Co., Boulder, CO.
Labels:
archaeoastronomy,
astronomy,
Fremont,
petroglyph,
Pleiades,
rock art,
Sego Canyon,
Utah
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment