(I have no idea why they reversed it)
Saturday, March 21, 2020
CAVE ART ACCURACY OF DETAIL IN ANIMAL DEPICTIONS IS BETTER THAN IN HISTORIC ART:
Aurochs, Lascaux Cave, France.
Internet photo, Public domain.
I
have recently written about the question of identifying varieties of deer in
cave paintings from their antler shapes, and also about cave artists learning
to portray perspective in aurochs horns over time. Joseph Stromberg wrote a
piece about cave pictures of animals in December 2012 with the title " Cavemen Were Much Better At Illustrating
Animals Than Artists Today." His article was a synopsis of a much
longer study by Horvath et. al. from Plosone, "Cavemen Were Better at Depicting Quadruped Walking than Modern Artists:
Erroneous Walking Illustrations in the Fine Arts from Prehistory to Today,"
which focused on the portrayal of the gaits of the animals pictured on cave walls.
Diagram of gait of Lascaux aurochs,
From Horvath et. al.
(I have no idea why they reversed it)
(I have no idea why they reversed it)
"The
leg attitudes of walking quadrupeds, especially horses, are also frequently
erroneously illustrated in the works of fine arts. These artistic
representations of walking quadrupeds have not been systematically studied from
a biomechanical point of view. To fill this gap, we have collected 1000
different fine art quadruped walking illustrations from the Internet and other
sources. We analysed them to decide whether they are correct or not in respect
to the relative limb positions with the assumption that the other aspects of
statues, paintings, drawings and reliefs used to determine animal gait are
depicted correctly. As a result we have determined the rate r of erroneous
artistic quadruped walking depictions. We obtained the error rates of artistic quadruped
walking illustrations for the prehistoric period, for the pre-Muybridge time
(after prehistory but prior to 1887) and for the post-Muybridge period (after
1887). We have also calculated the error rate for three-dimensional (cavalry
statues) and two-dimensional (paintings, graphic art, reliefs) artistic
quadruped walking depictions." (Horvath et. al. 2012)
In
this study the works of Paleolithic cave artists (particularly in Lascaux cave
in France) were compared to animal portrayals by artists from the Renaissance
until today. "The researchers
evaluated the prehistoric artists on the basis of the landmark 1880s finding by
British photographer Eadweard Maybridge that horses (and, it was later
discovered, most four-legged animals) move their legs in a particular sequence
as they walk. The "foot-fall formula," as it's called goes
LH-LF-RH-RF, where H means 'hind,' F means 'fore,' and L and R mean 'left' and
'right,' respectively. At the time of Muybridge, this was thought to be an
entirely novel discovery." (Stromberg 2012)
Horse drawings, Lascaux Cave, France.
Internet photos, Public domain.
But,
as the researchers discovered, the Paleolithic artists apparently had learned
it too. "Of the 39 ancient cave
paintings depicting the motion of four-legged animals that were considered in
the study, 21 nailed the sequence correctly, a success rate of 53.8%. Due to
the number of combinations of how a four-legged animal's gait can be depicted,
the researchers state that mere chance would lead to a 26.7% rate of getting it
right. Cavemen artists knew what they were doing." (Stromberg 2012)
Cavallo della Sforza, designed by
Leonardo da Vinci. Statue by
Nina Akamu, 1999,
Internet photo, Public domain.
"When
the researchers looked at 272 paintings and statues of four-legged animals made
during modern times but before Muybridge's finding in the 1880s, such as a
famous horse sketch by Leonardo da Vinci, it turned out that these more recent
artists were much worse: They only got the sequence right 16.5% of the time.
Remarkably, even the 686 paintings and statues studied that were made more
recently than 1887, after scientists knew for sure how four-legged animals
walked, still got it right just 42.1% of the time."
(Stromberg 2012)
Design for Cavallo della Sforza,
Leonardo da Vinci, 1482.
Internet photo, Public domain.
Drawings of prancing horses,
Leonardo da Vinci, 1482.
Internet photo, Public domain.
Leonardo
left many drawings of horses and designs for equestrian statues in his
notebooks and if they were shown as walking they illustrated the horse's gait
incorrectly. Since the cave paintings as well as Leonardo's sketches do not
generally include a ground line, the researchers had to estimate that to
complete their analysis, but, if more than one foot of the animal is raised
there is no way to draw a ground line that contacts three feet. Cave artists - 53.8% to Post-Muybridge modern artists - 42.1%, and we call them "Primitive" artists.
Now
it is important to again clarify that this only applies to walking gaits by
these large quadrupeds. Other gaits; trot, gallop, run, leaping, etc., can have
different characteristics including more than one foot off the ground at one
time.
NOTE: On August 25, 2019, I published "On Endless Motion - Depiction of Movement in
Upper Coa Valley Rock Art" on RockArtBlog. This discussed a 2009 paper
by L. Luis and A. P. B. Fernandes "On
endless motion: depiction of movement in the Upper Palaeolithic Côa Valley rock
art (Portugal)" in which they discussed animal portrayals in terms of
implied animation. The walking gait that Horvath et. al. are examining was
classified in this study as "Symmetrical
animation."
Some
images in this posting were retrieved from the internet with a search for public
domain photographs. If any of these images are not intended to be public
domain, I apologize, and will happily provide the picture credits if the owner
will contact me with them. For further information on these reports you should
read the original reports at the sites listed below.
REFERENCES:
Faris,
Peter
2019 On
Endless Motion - Depiction of Movement in Upper Côa Valley Rock Art, Portugal,
August 25, 2019, https://rockartblog.blogspot.com/search/label/Coa%20Valley
Horvath,
Gabor, Etelka Farkas, Ildiko Boncz, Miklos Blaho, and Gyorgy Kriska,
2012 Cavemen
Were Better at Depicting Quadruped Walking than Modern Artists: Erroneous
Walking Illustrations in the Fine Arts from Prehistory to Today, December
5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049786
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0049786.g003
Luis,
L., & Fernandes, A. P. B.
2009 On endless motion: depiction of movement in the
Upper Palaeolithic Côa Valley rock art (Portugal), In Congresso International
da IFRAO 2009, Piauỉ, Brasil, IFRAO, p. 1304-1318
Stromberg,
Joseph
2012 Cavemen
Were Much Better At Illustrating Animals Than Artists Today, December 5,
2012, https://www.smithsonianmag.com
Labels:
aurochs,
cave art,
horses,
Leonardo da Vinci,
paleolithic,
rock art
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment