Ach Valley carved mammoth
ivory, www.astronomytrek.com.
Public domain.
There is an old piece of advice that states "if you can't say something nice about
someone, don't say anything at all." This is obviously very good advice
for human interaction, but there are circumstances where erroneous or dangerous
ideas are being passed on, that I believe must be called out for what they are.
I have recently been writing a series of columns about the theories of Dr.
Michael Rappenglueck, who identifies star charts in Paleolithic art. I have
tried to patiently point out what I think are the flaws in his reasoning and
shown how I disagree with his conclusions. This example, however, is even
shakier than the others.
The Ach
Valley Tusk is a piece of mammoth ivory, recovered from Geißenklösterle
Cave near Ulm, Germany, that has a human figure carved into one side and a
series of 86 pits or notches cut into the other. Rappengluek identified the
human figure as a star map representing the constellation Orion.
Constellation Orion star chart,
www.ancient-origins.net,
Public Domain.
"Orion is a prominent constellation
located on the celestial equator and visible throughout the world. It is one of
the most conspicuous and recognizable constellations in the night sky. It was
named after Orion, a hunter in Greek mythology. Its brightest stars are Rigel
(Beta orionis) and Betelgeuse (Alpha orionis), a blue-white and a red
supergiant, respectively.
The earliest depiction that has been
linked to the constellation of Orion is a prehistoric (Aurignacian) mammoth
ivory carving found in a cave in the Ach valley in West Germany in 1979.
Archaeologists have estimated it to have been fashioned approximately 32,000 to
38,000 years ago. The distinctive pattern of Orion has been recognized in
numerous cultures around the world, and many myths have been associated with
it." (wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion)
Constellation Orion, NASA,
Public Domain, atoday.org.
Writing on astronomytrek.com, Peter Christoforou,
explained the proposition. According to Christoforou "Dr. Michael A. Rappengluck is well respected in academic circles,
and has a solid grounding in both astronomy and the history of astronomy. In
fact, Dr. Rappengluck holds an advanced degree in the History of Astronomy from
the University of Munich, and he has served as the President of the Society of
Archaeaoastronomy in Germany." (Christoforou 2018)
"According to research published
by Dr. Rappengluck, the figure must be Orion, since the slim waist of the
figure corresponds to the Belt of Orion, and the sword he sees hanging from the
waist of the figure is easy to see in the real constellation. Moreover, Dr.
Rappengluck is at some pains to point out that the figurines' left leg is
somewhat shorter than the right leg, just as it is in the constellation.
Therefore, the figure on the ivory fragment is Orion the Hunter." (Christoforou 2018) I feel I should
take this opportunity to point out that the writer Peter Christoforou has gone
out of his way to be fair to Rappenglueck, even if he is not convinced of the
carving's identity as Orion (and I urge you to read his whole paper at the
address below) he has given all the arguments, pro and con.
The usual
arguments still apply, but in this case a couple of new ones come into play as
well. First, thousands of bone, ivory, and antler carvings were recovered from Geißenklösterle
Cave but this is the only one that portrays a constellation? To make this
argument Christoforou pointed to a carving of a bison. "This figuring of a bison shows some simple bas-relief in addition
to faint details like horns and a beard, despite the fact that it measures only
25.5mm x 14.5 mm x 6 mm, which is comparable to the dimensions of the
human-like figure of the putative Orion star map. The original carving is
housed in the Wurttemberg Landesmuseum, Stuttgart.
While the existence of this
particular carving (the
bison) does not prove anything beyond the
fact that it shows exquisite workmanship, it is significant that neither Dr.
Rappenglueck, nor any other archeaoastronomers have suggested that the figure
represents the constellation Taurus, or any other constellation. Of course,
this does not prove that the Orion carving is not a star map, but the point is
that only one artifact from among the thousands recovered from the cave is
taken to represent a constellation. By all accounts, this is rather strange
considering the sheer amount of artifacts that could be taken as star maps, or
representations of the objects/patterns in the night sky."
(Christoforou 2018)
The other
obvious problem is, of course, the sword that Rappenglueck sees hanging from
the figure's belt, and that identifies him as Orion. Is it really like all the
other known Paleolithic swords to be so convincing? Oh wait, what's that you
say, there are no Paleolithic swords? What was I thinking of?
Another
issue is the fertility connection that Rappenglueck imbues this carving with.
Remember the 86 notches on the back of the carving? "The average length of human gestation is 280 days, or 40
weeks." (www.betterhealth.vic) Rappenglueck noted that if you subtract
the 86 notches from the number of days in a year you have a number that is very
close to the average length of modern human pregnancy. (The only references I
have been able to find about the length of pregnancy in the Paleolithic period
assume that it was the same as today).
"The reverse side of the Orion
carving is dotted with 86 notches, which Dr. Rappanglueck claims is a
"birth calendar". According to Dr. Rappenglueck, if one subtracts 86
from the number of days in a year (365), one arrives at the average human
gestation period, which is around 279 days, or nine months, gave or take a few
days either way. Nevertheless, this implies that the Aurignacian culture could
count, that they knew how many days there were in a year, and that they
understood and practiced basic arithmetic." (Christoforou 2018)
I am going
to give them some benefit of the doubt here - I assume that the Aurignacian
peoples could count. I find it inconceivable that they would have reached such
cultural heights and overlooked counting. I even assume that they could
understand and practice simple basic arithmetic. I am less convinced that they
knew the number of days in a year - 12 moons, yes, but the actual number of
days in a year, I don't know. This, however, makes no difference. What kind of
pregnancy calculation is made by subtracting 86 days from the end of a year,
when you don't know at what point the year started (when the pregnancy began)?
"Moreover, Dr. Rappenglueck
also claims that the 86 notches on the carving represent the number of days
that one of Orion's principal stars, Betelgeuse, is visible, thus forming a
link between the sky gods and human fertility." (Christoforou 2018)
This last
statement is particularly confusing because the truth is that Betelgeuse is
visible all year except for June and July when they are in the sky during
daylight hours. "In the Northern
Hemisphere, beginning in January of each year, it can be seen rising in the
east just after sunset. By mid-September to mid-March (best in mid-December),
it is visible to virtually every inhabited region of the globe, except for a
few research stations in Antarctica at latitudes south of 82˚. In May (moderate
northern latitudes) or June (southern latitudes), the red supergiant can be
seen briefly on the western horizon after sunset, reappearing again a few
months later on the eastern horizon before sunrise. In the intermediate period
(June-July) it is invisible to the naked eye (visible only with a telescope in
daylight) - - . " (wikipedia.org/wiki/Betelgeuse)
All in all, this Orion figurine is the most egregious of Rappenglueck's claimed
identifications of Paleolithic star maps, and I find it totally unbelievable.
NOTE: The pictures in this posting were retrieved from the internet with a search for public domain images. If they were not meant to be public domain please contact me and I will give full credit.
REFERENCES:
Christoforou,
Peter
2018 Is the
Ach Valley Tusk-fragment an Ancient Star Map?, March 2, 2018,
https://www.astronomytrek.com/is-the-ach-valley-tusk-fragnebt-an-ancient-star-map/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betelgeuse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_(constellation)
https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/healthyliving/baby-due-date
NASA
www.ancient-origins.net
www.astronomytrek.com
The part about there being a sword depiction from a time when there were no swords seals it.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Russell Lee
The part about there being a sword depiction from a time when there were no swords seals it.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Russell Lee
Who says its a sword? Many cultures see an anthropomorphic figure in the stars of Orion. In Australian Aoriginal traditions, his 'sword' is his penis. Is 'sword' not a euphamism for 'phallus'? Perhaps it has only changed in recent times for modesty's sake??
ReplyDelete