Ica stone of a man riding a triceratops. Wikipedia.
Whenever the conversation on dinosaurs in rock art is
brought up one will invariably hear about the Ica Stones from Peru.
“The Ica stones are a
collection of andesite stones found in Ica Province, Peru that bear a variety
of diagrams. Some of them have depictions of dinosaurs and what is alleged to
be advanced technology, and these are easily recognized as modern curiosities
or hoaxes.
From the 1960s Javier
Cabrera Darquea collected and popularized the stones, obtaining many of them
from a farmer named Basilio Uschuya. Uschuya, after claiming them to be real
ancient artifacts, admitted to creating the carvings he had sold and said he
produced a patina by baking the stones in cow dung.
This is, by the way, also the method used to produce the black finish on the pots made by the famous potter Maria from San Ildefonso. It is not part of a natural weathering process at all.
Ica stone of a man fighting dinosaurs
(allosaurs or tyrannosaurs). Internet.
Some of the images are
of flowers, fish, or living animals of various sorts. Others appear to depict
scenes which would be anachronistic in pre-Columbian art, namely extinct
animals, such as dinosaurs, advanced medical works and maps.
Ica stone illustrating brain surgery. Internet.
Meanwhile, in 1966,
Peruvian physician Javier Cabrera Darquea was presented with a stone that had a
carved picture of a fish, which Cabrera believed to be of an extinct
species. Cabrera's father had begun a collection of similar stones in the
1930s, and based on his interest in Peruvian prehistory, Cabrera began
collecting more. He initially purchased more than 300 from two brothers, Carlos
and Pablo Soldi, who also collected pre-Incan artifacts,
who claimed they had unsuccessfully attempted to interest archaeologists in
them. Cabrera later found another source of the stones, a farmer named Basilio
Uschuya, who sold him thousands more. Cabrera's collection burgeoned, reaching
more than 11,000 stones in the 1970s. Cabrera published a book, The Message of the Engraved Stones of Ica on
the subject, discussing his theories of the origins and meaning of the stones.
In this he argued that the stones show "that man is at least 405 million
years old" and that what he calls gliptolithic man, humans from another planet, and that
"Through the transplantation of cognitive codes to highly intelligent
primates, the men from outer space created new men on earth." The Ica stones
achieved greater popular interest when Cabrera abandoned his medical career and
opened a museum to feature several thousand of the stones in 1996. In
1973 during an interview with Erich von Däniken, Uschuya stated he had faked
the stones that he had sold“. (Wikipedia)
Ica stone with dinosaurs. Wikipedia.
What is so surprising to me is that some people take these
things seriously. We know the old inhabitants of this area as well or better
than we know the ancient inhabitants of anywhere on earth except possibly
Egypt. Not only are there Spanish colonial records of what they found when they
conquered their South American territories, we have a long running record of
archaeological investigations. Ica is found on the coastal desert of Peru along
the Pacific ocean. This is one of the driest regions in the world and
preservation of organic remains is better here than almost anywhere else known
to archaeologists. And in all of this there is a total lack of artifactual
evidence to back up the Ica stones. What concrete evidence could we expect to
find if
humans and dinosaurs had coexisted in Peru? You might examine burials for injuries
caused by dinosaur teeth, or for artifacts made of dinosaur teeth or bones, you
might even look for the remains of small pet dinosaurs in human burials, or
human remains in the stomach area of excavated dinosaurs. You would find
dinosaur bones and human burials in the same soil horizons during excavations
that could be dated and demonstrated to have been laid down concurrently, and
the truth is we find none of that. Indeed, I have been unable to find any reference to dinosaur remains found in that area at all.
Ica stone, man attacked by dinosaur.
http://www.paleo.cccedino/art.htm
In his book Encyclopedia
of Dubious Archaeology: From Atlantis to the Walam Olum, Kenneth Feder
(2010) stated: “There is, I hope needless
to say, not a shred of evidence for any of this positively crazy stuff.
Although he has been very difficult to pin down and while he has recanted just
about every version of the story he has told, Cabrera’s major source for the
Ica Stones, Basilio Uschuya, has admitted to being not the discoverer of the
stones but their fabricator. Basing the images on photographs, drawings, and
illustrations in magazines and books, he engraves the images onto and through
the dark surface of the stones using metal knives, chisels, and a dental drill.
Then, to add a patina of age to the stones, he bakes them in donkey and cow
dung, which seems poetically appropriate. The Ica Stones clearly are not the
most sophisticated of the archaeological hoaxes discussed in this book, but
they certainly rank up there as the most preposterous.” (Feder 2010:143)
Indeed, these are so obviously fakes I have to wonder why anyone
with any education or common sense at all would espouse their case. The only
conclusion I can reach is that their motivation is venality, material gain from
selling books, and speaker’s honorariums from giving travel speeches and
creationist symposia. To me, far from supporting the bible by their position,
they are dishonoring it by associating it with these prevarications and
falsehoods by the most vocal proponents.
And remember, far from reinforcing the Creationist’s belief that
humans have only existed for 6,000 years, the Ica stones convinced their first
investigator, Cabrera, that we have existed for 405 million years. Let’s see
you fit that into Bishop Usher’s dating scheme.
Now, if you take violent exception to my statements above and wish to discuss this in a rational manner, I will be happy to correspond about it. Those of you named Anonymous who wish to only insult and threaten me, please keep your frustration to yourselves, but to all others, conversation is an art. Let us practice it together.
REFERENCES:
Feder, Kenneth L.
2010 Encyclopedia
of Dubious Archaeology: From Atlantis to the Walam Olum, Greenwood, Santa
Barbara, Denver, and Oxford.
Wikipedia
Plz look at the map stones. On the stones with the circle around the maps and the drawn mountains to show that it is an inner Earth map, there are clearly dinosaurs depicted. Since meteorites only hit the outside of Earth, it is very likely species of the inner Earth survived. There are also stones that depict maps of the outer Earth with humans and animals that we know, but no dinosaurs. Of course you will dismiss this information but if you have a look into it, you will agree. Maybe you need a few years.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely. There are a lot of evidence some dinosaurs survived the impact. Read the book "We Lived with Dinosaurs" by James Edward Gilmer. Scientists and experts need to be more open minded. I also remember there was a fossil sent to a university to carbon date it, they didn't say it was a "dinosaur fossil". The age came back to be around 10,000 years old. As soon as you say it's a "dinosaur fossil", they immediately add +xxx million years. We also had the T-Rex red blood cells. I mean, there's just a lot... read the book. It's an absolute eye opener.
DeleteMy problem with this finding that we never existed at the same time is this, how did they know in the 1930s that this animal had fins on its back when we just found out in 2019 when we found a fossil of one? If it was a fake they would have never put fins on it, they would have gone with the excepted narrative of the time which said there was none.
ReplyDelete