On June 3, 2009, I posted the following column under the title Charles Darwin's Bear.
"Don't Deface the Bear", 5BN651, Picketwire canyon, Bent
County, CO., Photograph, Peter Faris, June, 1991.
"At the time of his death Charles Darwin had in his correspondence files a
letter that had accompanied a photograph of a Colorado pictograph. According to
the on-line database of the Darwin Correspondence Project at
the University of Cambridge, England, they (the letter and accompanying photo) were sent on May 24, 1874, by Lieut.
George J. Anderson, of Fort Lyon, Colorado. The database entry refers to the letter, which describes the image as a
“photograph of a ‘natural curiosity’, a bear apparently ‘painted’ with red iron
on the face of a soft rock”. The letter itself forms part of the Darwin Archive
at Cambridge University Library, but the photograph has not been found.
I had found mention of this a number of years ago and was interested enough to
pursue a search in an attempt to identify which bear image from southern
Colorado this might be. During a subsequent conversation with Larry Loendorf we
agreed that it might be the large Picketwire bear. This figure was prominent,
had been discovered and publicized early on - its photograph had been printed
in newspapers. Loendorf also pointed out that it was originally known as the
“cinnamon bear” because rain runoff from the canyon rim had dyed it red with
the red dust of the soil. This seems to match the description of it being
“apparently ‘painted’ with red iron on the face of a soft rock”.
On May 13, 2009, I received from the Darwin Correspondence Project a transcription of the letter, which described the picture and its location. “The
image is painted – as it were – on a perpendicular face of a very soft grey
sandstone rock, about 40 feet from its base & 38 feet from its top, but may
be easily reached – to the level of the bottom of the picture – by climbing
over the dèbris at the foot of the bluff. . . . The coloring matter appears to
be iron (probably Fe3O4) and penetrates the rock to a depth of more than ½
inch. . . . The image is in length, from nose to tail, about 8½ feet”. (This
preliminary transcription has yet to be published in the Correspondence of
Charles Darwin.)
Anderson’s description of the image size seems to fit that of
the large Picketwire Bear and I know of no other bear pictograph in
southeastern Colorado of that size, but its location is nothing like that
described in the letter. The location of the large Picketwire Bear is basically
just a little above the present ground surface on a slight slope. Unless we can
be assured by a geomorphologist that the canyon bottom has been raised by
nearly 40 feet (unlikely since the canyon bottom can be demonstrated to have
been eroding deeper) since the creation of the pictograph, then I see no way to
reconcile the present location of this bear with the described location. If we
are lucky the original picture may some day be located in the Darwin archives:
meanwhile the identity of the southeast Colorado bear pictograph sent to
Charles Darwin remains a mystery.
(I wish to extend an extra thank you to Rosemary Clarkson of the Darwin
Correspondence Project for her generous assistance with my inquiry.)"
At that time I had not yet read Paul Bahn's 2010 book Prehistoric Rock Art: Problems and Polemics. In that book Bahn takes up the question of trying to determine the oldest existing rock art photograph.
Bahn wrote “One interesting question which was not answered in my
earlier book is that of when the first photograph was taken of rock art; two
examples were given (Bahn 1998a : 30, 69) of photos of rock art in the United
States taken in the 1890s, and it was also stated (ibid.: 69) that the first
known photograph of an African rock painting was taken by von Bonde in 1885.
Recently, however, two earlier examples have come to light.” (p. 7)
“On the Carrizo Plain of California is the (now much
damaged) Chumash painted site known as Painted Rock. Four photographs of this,
taken by R. A. Holmes, were published in a fanciful book by Myron Angel called The
Legend of Painted Rock (Angel 1920), which claims that the pictures were
taken in 1876. The photograph reprinted here (Fig. 3) is now housed in the
collections of the San Luis Obispo Historical Society (W. Hyder, personal
communication).
If that 1876 date is accurate, this may be the earliest
known rock art photo, and on present evidence it is probably the earliest to
have survived. There is at least one other claimant, however, which has not
survived as far as is known. In France in 1878, Leopold Chiron, a
schoolteacher, noticed deep engravings in the cave of Chabot (Gard); he
published a note about hem, although he could not know their date of origin. He
mistakenly thought he could see birds and people among the lines;
unfortunately, the Chabot engravings are difficult to decipher, and the figures
are far from clear. In May 1879, Chiron wrote to the eminent Gabriel de
Mortillet to tell him of the discovery of a cave with Paleolithic flint tools
and with engravings on the walls – Chiron had no doubt the drawings were
ancient because they were covered in calcite. De Mortillet, however, who was certain
that no parietal art could exist in Palaeolithic times, did not deign to reply
– or to present the information in the journal he published (Bahn and Vertut
1997: 16).
In the 1890s Chiron exchanged letters with Francois Daleau,
another pioneer who had excavated the decorated cave of Pair-non-Pair near
Bordeaux, and had seen its art in 1883, although he did not make the discovery
of the art public until 1896. It is from this correspondence that we know
Chiron had the Chabot engravings photographed in 1878.” (p. 8)"
In this we see that Bahn's oldest example so far seems to be the 1876 photograph of Chumash rock art on the Carrizo plain in California. Until Charles Darwin's bear photograph is relocated by the good folks at the Darwin Correspondence Project it is likely to remain so. However, from the correspondence we know that Darwin's Bear photograph existed in 1874 so it would be the oldest known example. How about you, what other early rock art photos can you suggest to Paul Bahn?
REFERENCES:
Bahn, Paul G.
2010 Prehistoric Rock Art: Problems and Polemics,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Faris, Peter
2009 Charles Darwin's Bear, http://rockartblog.blogspot.com, June 3, 2009.
This is the same bear that made headines in the 1870's. Although this may be a different photo than the one Darwin received, a stereoview by Guernsey, "Photograph of a Bear on the Rock," which dates from that time. It's mentioned in the British Journal of Photography, and having seen an original copy, I can attest that the rock features nearby are identical. Let me know if you would like me to send you a copy.
ReplyDelete