Over the past few years I have written two previous columns about Ammoglyphs (click on ammoglyph in the cloud index at the bottom of the page). This newly designated form of rock art consists of a design drawn in sand which then became covered with more sand instead of being erased or destroyed. This sand can become consolidated over time to sandstone and splitting open layers of sandstone may reveal the original design. Obviously, this requires a number of precarious things to take place for the design to survive the millennia, but this is exactly what happened on a South African beach.
“Our own remarkable discovery
happened on a rugged, remote stretch of coastline east of Still Bay on South
Africa’s Cape south coast. It was low tide, and three members of our ichnology
team (people who study tracks and traces) were in search of newly exposed
Pleistocene vertebrate tracksites in aeolianites (cemented dunes). Ahead we saw
a large rock that had tumbled down from the cliffs above. On its surface was a
pattern of linear groove features in a large triangular shape, complete with an
almost perfect bisecting groove. The sides of the triangle were close to a
metre in length. After extensive research, we concluded that these grooves must
have been made on a dune surface of unconsolidated sand by our human ancestors
in the Middle Stone Age. The patterns are likely between 143,000 and 91,000
years old.” (Helm
2024)
This
remarkable discovery in South Africa opened our eyes to another entirely new
category of rock art which they named ammoglyphs. Intentional marks made on
sand later consolidated into sandstone and subsequently exposed again by
natural forces like erosion. This makes that particular piece of beach in Still
Bay on South Africa’s southern Cape coast the ‘type’ site for ammoglyphs,
important indeed.
“But there was a problem. On a
follow-up visit we found a smaller rock close by with a similar triangular
feature. Subsequently, it was destroyed, likely by storm surges or high tides
buffeting and overturning it. We knew that the larger rock inevitably awaited a
similar fate of we did nothing. From our perspective this is one of the most
important rocks in the world: it takes us back to our roots as a species and
indicates the kind of ‘proto-art’ we were capable of creating so long ago. So
we staged and unusual mission: a ‘rescue operation designed to get the
approximately 500 kilogram rock to safety – in a museum.” (Helm 2024)
"The rock has subsequently been encased and placed on exhibit, with interpretive text panels. It joins similar exhibits in the museum; the grooves were an example of an ammoglyph, a term we had coined to describe a pattern created by humans in sand that is now evident in rock that has become cemented and then re-exposed." (Helm 2024)
Thirty-five years ago there was a considerable amount of talk about Historical Tourism, and a small town in southeastern Colorado near Picture Canyon devised a plan to build a prehistory museum to attract tourists. They proposed to start by moving a petroglyph covered boulder from a ranch in the area to be one of their major displays. Now moving a petroglyph boulder to rescue it from destruction, and moving it for a profit motive are two entirely different things. I thought the museum idea was a great idea considering the large quantity of rock art in that area, but I was appalled at the thought of desecrating the rock art site for it. Luckily it never happened. What I heard was that they could not afford equipment big enough to handle the boulder. Luckily, in this South African example, they could arrange for the right equipment, and it was moved to save it – rescued.
REFERENCE:
Helm, Charles, and Jan Carlo De Vynck, 2024, Rock Stars: how a group of scientists in
South Africa rescued a rare 500 kg chunk of human history, https://news.yahoo.com. Accessed online 24
May 2024.
Very Cool, Peter! Thanks!
ReplyDelete